Popperian Falsificationism in IS: Major Confusions and Harmful Influences
Mao, M., Siponen, M., & Nathan, M. (2023). Popperian Falsificationism in IS: Major Confusions and Harmful Influences. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 53, 796-814. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05333
Date
2023Discipline
Empirical Cyber Security and Software EngineeringTietojärjestelmätiedeEmpirical Cyber Security and Software EngineeringInformation Systems ScienceCopyright
© Association for Information Systems
The current relation between Popper’s philosophy of science and Information Systems (IS) is complex and often confused. On the one hand, many influential members of the IS community claim that much IS research follows Popper’s falsificationism. On the other hand, many assumptions underlying Popper’s falsificationism, including the nature of theories as an exceptionless laws rejected by a singular unsupportive observation, are inappropriate and misleading. Moreover, Popper also rejected all inductive inferences and inductive methods as unscientific which, alas, has led some influential IS scholars to dismiss inductive inferences in major IS methodologies. Such Popperian advice is harmful as virtually all statistical or qualitative IS research relies on inductive inferences – and there is nothing wrong with that. Finally, we offer a solution for how to deal with the scientific significance of the problem of induction. This solution is inductive fallibilism. This means recognizing that theories, rather than always being held as true or false simpliciter, often contain varying inductive supportive and unsupportive evidence.
...
![showless](/themes/JYX2//images/showless.png)
![showmore](/themes/JYX2//images/showmore.png)
Publisher
Association for Information SystemsISSN Search the Publication Forum
1529-3181Keywords
Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/185042029
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
On natural science beliefs in IS : Short comments to commentators
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Sage Publications, 2021) -
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2020)We respond to Lee’s (forthcoming) commentary on our article “Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism” (Siponen & Tsohou [S&T], 2018). Lee offers four arguments against our analyses and conclusions in S&T ... -
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2018)Positivism has been used to establish a standard that Information Systems (IS) research must meet to be scientific. According to such positivistic beliefs in IS, scientific research should: 1) be generalizable, 2) focus ... -
The Scientific Moment of the Bergsonian Method
Lipsanen, Katariina (Société des amis de Bergson, 2024)This paper explores the role of scientific knowledge from the perspective of Henri Bergson’s philosophical method. For Bergson, scientific knowledge plays a key part in philosophy. He presents his philosophical method as ... -
The Influence of the Avicennan Theory of Science on Philosophical Sufism : The Concept of the Divine Science in Qūnawī and Fanārī
Daşdemir, Yusuf (Brill, 2020)This article discusses the application of the Avicennan theory of demonstrative science on taṣawwuf, or the Divine Science (al-ʿilm al-ilāhī), by members of the Akbarian tradition, particularly Ibn ʿArabī’s (d. 1240) stepson ...