Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism
Siponen, M., & Tsohou, A. (2018). Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19 (7), 600-617. doi:10.17705/1jais.00503
Published in
Journal of the Association for Information SystemsDate
2018Discipline
TietojärjestelmätiedeCopyright
© the Authors & Association for Information Systems, 2018.
Positivism has been used to establish a standard that Information Systems (IS) research must meet
to be scientific. According to such positivistic beliefs in IS, scientific research should: 1) be
generalizable, 2) focus on stable independent variables, 3) have certain ontological assumptions, and
4) use statistical or quantitative methods rather than qualitative methods. We argue that logical
positivist philosophers required none of these. On the contrary, logical positivist philosophers
regarded philosophizing in general and ontological considerations in particular as nonsense.
Moreover, the positivists’ preferred empirical research method was not a survey, but rather a
qualitative observation recorded by field notes. In addition, positivist philosophers required neither
statistical nor nonstatistical generalizability. At least some positivist philosophers also
acknowledged the study of singular cases as being scientific. Many research orientations (e.g.,
single-setting research, examination of change, qualitative research) that are deemed “unscientific”
by positivism in IS seem to be “scientific” (in principle) according to logical positivism. In turn,
generally speaking, what has been justified as scientific by positivism in IS (e.g., requirements of
statistical or nonstatistical generalizability, surveys, independent variables, ontological views) were
either not required by logical positivists or were regarded as nonsensical by logical positivists.
Furthermore, given that positivism is sometimes associated (or confused) with logical empiricism in
IS, we also briefly discuss logical empiricism. Finally, realizing that certain influential, taken-forgranted
assumptions that underlie IS research are unwarranted could have ground-breaking
implications for future IS research.
...


Publisher
Association for Information SystemsISSN Search the Publication Forum
1536-9323Keywords
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2020)We respond to Lee’s (forthcoming) commentary on our article “Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism” (Siponen & Tsohou [S&T], 2018). Lee offers four arguments against our analyses and conclusions in S&T ... -
How and Why ‘Theory’ Is Often Misunderstood in Information Systems Literature
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Association for Information Systems, 2019)IS theory accounts have increased our understanding of scientific theories. However, many influential theory accounts in Information Systems (IS) are influenced by the Received View of scientific theory (RV), which flourished ... -
On the conditions for objectivity : how to avoid bias in socially relevant research
Jukola, Saana (University of Jyväskylä, 2015) -
Essays concerning Hume's natural philosophy
Slavov, Matias (University of Jyväskylä, 2016)The subject of this essay-based dissertation is Hume’s natural philosophy. The dissertation consists of four separate essays and an introduction. These essays do not only treat Hume’s views on the topic of natural ... -
Culture in sustainability : towards a transdisciplinary approach
Asikainen, Sari; Brites, Claudia; Plebańczyk, Katarzyna; Rogač Mijatović, Ljiljana; Soini, Katriina (Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2017)