On natural science beliefs in IS : Short comments to commentators
Siponen, M., & Klaavuniemi, T. (2021). On natural science beliefs in IS : Short comments to commentators. Journal of Information Technology, 36(1), 90-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220948252
Published inJournal of Information Technology
© Association for Information Technology Trust 2020
ISSN Search the Publication Forum0268-3962
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Additional information about fundingThe author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Research Perspectives : Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Interpretive, Mixed Methods, and Design Science Research Siponen, Mikko; Soliman, Wael; Holtkamp, Philipp (Association for Information Systems, 2021)Information systems (IS) scholars have proposed guidelines for interpretive, mixed methods, and design science research in IS. Because many of these guidelines are also suggested for evaluating what good or rigorous research ...
The growth of knowledge : an inquiry into the Kuhnian theory Verronen, Veli (Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2009)
Grand theories or design guidelines? : Perspectives on the role of theory in computing education research Tedre, Matti; Pajunen, John (Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2023)A rich body of empirically grounded results and a solid theory base have often been viewed as signs of a mature discipline. Many disciplines have frequently debated what they should accept as legitimate kinds of theories, ...
Demystifying beliefs about the natural sciences in information system Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (SAGE Publications, 2021)
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2020)We respond to Lee’s (forthcoming) commentary on our article “Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism” (Siponen & Tsohou [S&T], 2018). Lee offers four arguments against our analyses and conclusions in S&T ...