Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary
Siponen, M., & Tsohou, A. (2020). Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), Article 1653-1659. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00650
Published in
Journal of the Association for Information SystemsDate
2020Copyright
© 2020 Association for Information Systems
We respond to Lee’s (forthcoming) commentary on our article “Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism” (Siponen & Tsohou [S&T], 2018). Lee offers four arguments against our analyses and conclusions in S&T (2018). First, because logical positivism (LP) has been discredited, he contends it cannot be used as a normative standard in IS. We clarify that our conclusions in S&T (2018) point to (1) the lack of justification for certain IS beliefs, and (2) a misunderstanding rather than legitimacy of LP as a philosophy of science. Second, Lee argues that IS researchers characterizing positivism never said they were following the tenets of LP. We provide evidence to show some influential papers on positivism in IS research indicated they were indeed following LP. Third, Lee offers an alternative explanation for the emergence and nature of IS positivism. His explanation has merit, and it can be accommodated in S&T’s (2018) account of positivism in IS. Unfortunately, his explanation does not account for certain problems in the IS discipline’s use of positivism. In S&T (2018), we provide a plausible explanation for these problems. Finally, we discuss the implications of S&T’s (2018) findings for the need to better understand the philosophical assumptions underlying “IS positivism.” We also counter Lee’s arguments that our conclusions in S&T (2018) should not make a difference to the future of IS research.
...
Publisher
Association for Information SystemsISSN Search the Publication Forum
1536-9323Keywords
Original source
https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol21/iss6/1/Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/35907287
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2018)Positivism has been used to establish a standard that Information Systems (IS) research must meet to be scientific. According to such positivistic beliefs in IS, scientific research should: 1) be generalizable, 2) focus ... -
Popperian Falsificationism in IS: Major Confusions and Harmful Influences
Mao, Mingsong; Siponen, Mikko; Nathan, Marco (Association for Information Systems, 2023)The current relation between Popper’s philosophy of science and Information Systems (IS) is complex and often confused. On the one hand, many influential members of the IS community claim that much IS research follows ... -
How and Why ‘Theory’ Is Often Misunderstood in Information Systems Literature
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Association for Information Systems, 2019)IS theory accounts have increased our understanding of scientific theories. However, many influential theory accounts in Information Systems (IS) are influenced by the Received View of scientific theory (RV), which flourished ... -
On natural science beliefs in IS : Short comments to commentators
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Sage Publications, 2021) -
The Case Study in Family Business : An Analysis of Current Research Practices and Recommendations
Leppäaho, Tanja; Plakoyiannaki, Emmanuella; Dimitratos, Pavlos (Sage Publications, Inc.; Family Firm Institute, 2016)In this study we identified and analyzed 75 articles in the family business (FB) literature between 2000 and 2014, focusing on the case study design they adopted. We found the positivistic case study approach to be the ...