Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorSiponen, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorKlaavuniemi, Tuula
dc.contributor.editorKruse, Leona Chandra
dc.contributor.editorSeidel, Stefan
dc.contributor.editorHausvik, Geir Inge
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T10:18:45Z
dc.date.available2021-07-28T10:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSiponen, M., & Klaavuniemi, T. (2021). The Primary Scientific Contribution Is Hardly a Theory in Design Science Research. In L. C. Kruse, S. Seidel, & G. I. Hausvik (Eds.), <i>DESRIST 2021 : The proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design</i> (pp. 137-146). Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12807. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_16</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_97960361
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77228
dc.description.abstractGenerally, to publish a paper in a top IS journal, making a new theory contribution is, so we are told, required. Such a requirement also exists in Design Science Research (DSR) literature. We review a number of claims about the necessity of theory as it applies to DSR. We find these claims wanting. For example, medical research and engineering are both called “design science” in Simon’s(1996) Sciences of the Artificial. However, most articles in the top medical, computer engineering, and network engineering journals do not develop new theories. Unless the proponents of theories, as the primary vehicle of scientific DSR knowledge, can offer a satisfactory argument for why theories are the primary scientific contribution, we do not have to regard ‘theory’ as the primary outcome of good scientific research in DSR. If we are correct, then theory is not valuable in its own right in (applied) science, as theory serves higher purposes.en
dc.format.extent400
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofDESRIST 2021 : The proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. The Next Wave of Sociotechnical Design
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.othertheory
dc.subject.otherdesign science research
dc.titleThe Primary Scientific Contribution Is Hardly a Theory in Design Science Research
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202107284399
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineTietojärjestelmätiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineInformation Systems Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper
dc.relation.isbn978-3-030-82404-4
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange137-146
dc.relation.issn0302-9743
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 Springer
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology
dc.subject.ysotieteellinen tieto
dc.subject.ysotieteenteoria
dc.subject.ysoteoriat
dc.subject.ysotiede
dc.subject.ysotutkimus
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7837
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3019
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p127
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2240
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p183
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.relation.doi10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_16
dc.type.okmA4


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright