Grand theories or design guidelines? : Perspectives on the role of theory in computing education research
Tedre, M., & Pajunen, J. (2023). Grand theories or design guidelines? : Perspectives on the role of theory in computing education research. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487049
Julkaistu sarjassa
ACM Transactions on Computing EducationPäivämäärä
2023Tekijänoikeudet
© 2022 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
A rich body of empirically grounded results and a solid theory base have often been viewed as signs of a mature discipline. Many disciplines have frequently debated what they should accept as legitimate kinds of theories, the proper roles of theory, and appropriate reference disciplines. Computing education research (CER) in particular has seen a growing number of calls for the development of domain-speciic theories for CER, adaptation of theories from other ields, and engagement with theory-based experimental and predictive research in CER. Many of those calls share the same concerns and aims, yet they use very diferent vocabulary and lack a consensus over an essential concept: theory. This article presents sticking points and trouble spots in CER’s theory debates and presents a number of suggestions and ways forward. Firstly, by slightly shifting towards a model-based view of science, CER can avoid centuries of conceptual baggage related to the concept of theory. Secondly, insofar as ields like design, engineering, and social science are considered to be legitimate parts of CER, the role of theory in many CER studies needs to be judged by the criteria of the philosophy of engineering, technology, and social science, not the philosophy of (natural) science. Thirdly, instead of force-itting elements of ill-suited research paradigms from other disciplines, the philosophy of CER should focus on building a consensus on CER’s own paradigm and describing the ield’s relationship with theory in CER’s own terms.
...
Julkaisija
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)ISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1946-6226Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/119016472
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Research Perspectives : Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Interpretive, Mixed Methods, and Design Science Research
Siponen, Mikko; Soliman, Wael; Holtkamp, Philipp (Association for Information Systems, 2021)Information systems (IS) scholars have proposed guidelines for interpretive, mixed methods, and design science research in IS. Because many of these guidelines are also suggested for evaluating what good or rigorous research ... -
The Primary Scientific Contribution Is Hardly a Theory in Design Science Research
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Springer, 2021)Generally, to publish a paper in a top IS journal, making a new theory contribution is, so we are told, required. Such a requirement also exists in Design Science Research (DSR) literature. We review a number of claims ... -
Computational Rationality as a Theory of Interaction
Oulasvirta, Antti; Jokinen, Jussi P. P.; Howes, Andrew (ACM, 2022)How do people interact with computers? This fundamental question was asked by Card, Moran, and Newell in 1983 with a proposition to frame it as a question about human cognition – in other words, as a matter of how information ... -
Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology : potential contributions of a critical realist perspective
Ryba, Tatiana V.; Wiltshire, Gareth; North, Julian; Ronkainen, Noora J. (Taylor & Francis, 2022)Notwithstanding diverse opinions and debates about mixing methods, mixed methods research (MMR) is increasingly being used in sport and exercise psychology. In this paper, we describe MMR trends within leading sport and ... -
Positionality statements in science
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti (F1000 Research Ltd, 2024)The goal of this essay is to clarify positionality as an epistemological scientific concept and address related misunderstandings to help researchers assess whether statements thereof contribute to their work. Positionality ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.