Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences
Christie, A. P., Abecasis, D., Adjeroud, M., Alonso, J. C., Amano, T., Anton, A., Baldigo, B. P., Barrientos, R., Bicknell, J. E., Buhl, D. A., Cebrian, J., Ceia, R. S., Cibils-Martina, L., Clarke, S., Claudet, J., Craig, M. D., Davoult, D., De Backer, A., Donovan, M. K., . . . Sutherland, W. J. (2020). Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Nature Communications, 11, Article 6377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20142-y
Published inNature Communications
DisciplineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiaResurssiviisausyhteisöEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)Ecology and Evolutionary BiologySchool of Resource WisdomCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Research
© The Author(s) 2020
Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings. Researchers employ many different study designs that vary in their risk of bias to evaluate the true effect of interventions or impacts. Here, we empirically quantify, on a large scale, the prevalence of different study designs and the magnitude of bias in their estimates. Randomised designs and controlled observational designs with pre-intervention sampling were used by just 23% of intervention studies in biodiversity conservation, and 36% of intervention studies in social science. We demonstrate, through pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 environmental datasets, that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational designs. We propose a model-based approach to combine study estimates that may suffer from different levels of study design bias, discuss the implications for evidence synthesis, and how to facilitate the use of more credible study designs. ...
PublisherNature Publishing Group
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Kaijanaho, Antti-Juhani (University of Jyväskylä, 2015)Background: Programming language design is not usually informed by empirical studies. In other ﬁelds similar problems have inspired an evidence-based paradigm of practice. Such a paradigm is practically inevitable in ...
Research Perspectives : Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Interpretive, Mixed Methods, and Design Science Research Siponen, Mikko; Soliman, Wael; Holtkamp, Philipp (Association for Information Systems, 2021)Information systems (IS) scholars have proposed guidelines for interpretive, mixed methods, and design science research in IS. Because many of these guidelines are also suggested for evaluating what good or rigorous research ...
Teaching master’s degree students to read research literature : Experience in a programming languages course 2002-2017 Kaijanaho, Antti-Juhani (ACM, 2017)The skill to read research literature critically belongs in every university graduate’s toolbox. I have attempted to teach this skill in a master’s degree level course in programming languages over 15 years using, at ...
The extent of empirical evidence that could inform evidence-based design of programming languages : a systematic mapping study Kaijanaho, Antti-Juhani (University of Jyväskylä, 2014)
Social, health and rehabilitation sector educators’ competence in evidence‐based practice : a cross‐sectional study Halvari, Johanna; Mikkonen, Kristina; Kääriäinen, Maria; Kuivila, Heli; Holopainen, Arja; Immonen, Kati; Koivula, Meeri; Koskinen, Camilla; Sjögren, Tuulikki; Kyngäs, Helvi; Tuomikoski, Anna‐Maria (Wiley-Blackwell, 2021)Aim The purpose of the study was to identify and describe the characteristic profiles of evidence-based practice competence of educators in the social, health and rehabilitation sectors and to establish relevant background ...