Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorZheng, Dongying
dc.contributor.authorHao, Xinyu
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Muhanmmad
dc.contributor.authorKang, Fuli
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fan
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Timo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lixia
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T12:28:30Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T12:28:30Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationZheng, D., Hao, X., Khan, M., Kang, F., Li, F., Hämäläinen, T., & Wang, L. (2024). Effect of variable selection strategy on the predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes of pre-eclampsia : A retrospective study. <i>Placenta and Reproductive Medicine</i>, <i>3</i>, Article 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2024.0318" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2024.0318</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_207618493
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/93969
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The improvement of prediction for adverse pregnancy outcomes is quite essential to the women suffering from pre-eclampsia, while the collection of predictive indicators is the prerequisite. The traditional knowledge-based strategy for variable selection confronts challenge referring to dataset with high-dimensional or unfamiliar data. In this study, we employed five different automatic variable selection methods to screen out influential indicators, and evaluated the performance of constructed predictive models. Methods: Seven hundreds and thirty-three Han-Chinese women were enrolled and 56 clinical and laboratory variables were recorded. After grouping based on binary pregnancy outcomes, statistical description and analysis were performed. Then, utilizing forward stepwise logistic regression (FSLR) as the reference method, another four variable selection strategies were included for filtering contributing variables as the predictive subsets, respectively. Finally, the logistic regression prediction models were constructed by the five subsets and evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic curve. Results: The variables confirmed statistical significance between the adverse and satisfactory outcomes groups did not overlap with the variables selected by selection strategies. “Platelet” and “Creatinine clearance rate” were the most influential indicator to predict adverse maternal outcome, while “Birth weight of neonates” was the best indicator for predicting adverse neonatal outcome. In average, the predictive models for neonatal outcomes achieved better performance than models for maternal outcomes. “Mutual information” and “Recursive feature elimination” were the best strategy under current dataset and study design. Conclusions: Variable selection strategies may provide an alternative approach besides picking influential indicators by statistical significance. Future work will focus on applying different variable selection methods to the high-dimensional dataset, which includes novel or unfamiliar variables. This aims to identify the most appropriate collection of predictors that can enhance prediction ability and clinical decision-making.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherScholar Media Publishing Company
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPlacenta and Reproductive Medicine
dc.relation.urihttps://www.hksmp.com/journals/prm/article/view/318
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherpre-eclampsia
dc.subject.otherfeature selection
dc.subject.othervariable selection
dc.subject.otherlogistic regression
dc.subject.otherforward stepwise
dc.subject.othermutual information
dc.subject.otherleast absolute shrinkage and selection
dc.subject.otherrecursive feature elimination
dc.subject.otherprincipal component analysis
dc.titleEffect of variable selection strategy on the predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes of pre-eclampsia : A retrospective study
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202403192483
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2790-0428
dc.relation.volume3
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2024 Placenta and Reproductive Medicine
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokoneoppiminen
dc.subject.ysoraskaus
dc.subject.ysomallit (mallintaminen)
dc.subject.ysomallintaminen
dc.subject.ysopre-eklampsia
dc.subject.ysoindikaattorit
dc.subject.ysoennusteet
dc.subject.ysoregressioanalyysi
dc.subject.ysopääkomponenttianalyysi
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21846
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8749
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p510
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3533
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19068
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8365
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3297
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2130
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p39800
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.54844/prm.2024.0318
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0