Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression as predictive models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia : A retrospective study
Zheng, D., Hao, X., Khan, M., Wang, L., Li, F., Xiang, N., Kang, F., Hamalainen, T., Cong, F., Song, K., & Qiao, C. (2022). Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression as predictive models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preeclampsia : A retrospective study. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, Article 959649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.959649
Julkaistu sarjassa
Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineTekijät
Li, Fan |
Päivämäärä
2022Oppiaine
TietotekniikkaTekniikkaSecure Communications Engineering and Signal ProcessingMathematical Information TechnologyEngineeringSecure Communications Engineering and Signal ProcessingTekijänoikeudet
© 2022 Zheng, Hao, Khan, Wang, Li,
Xiang, Kang, Hamalainen, Cong, Song
and Qiao.
Introduction: Preeclampsia, one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, demands accurate predictive models for the lack of effective treatment. Predictive models based on machine learning algorithms demonstrate promising potential, while there is a controversial discussion about whether machine learning methods should be recommended preferably, compared to traditional statistical models.
Methods: We employed both logistic regression and six machine learning methods as binary predictive models for a dataset containing 733 women diagnosed with preeclampsia. Participants were grouped by four different pregnancy outcomes. After the imputation of missing values, statistical description and comparison were conducted preliminarily to explore the characteristics of documented 73 variables. Sequentially, correlation analysis and feature selection were performed as preprocessing steps to filter contributing variables for developing models. The models were evaluated by multiple criteria.
Results: We first figured out that the influential variables screened by preprocessing steps did not overlap with those determined by statistical differences. Secondly, the most accurate imputation method is K-Nearest Neighbor, and the imputation process did not affect the performance of the developed models much. Finally, the performance of models was investigated. The random forest classifier, multi-layer perceptron, and support vector machine demonstrated better discriminative power for prediction evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, while the decision tree classifier, random forest, and logistic regression yielded better calibration ability verified, as by the calibration curve.
Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms can accomplish prediction modeling and demonstrate superior discrimination, while Logistic Regression can be calibrated well. Statistical analysis and machine learning are two scientific domains sharing similar themes. The predictive abilities of such developed models vary according to the characteristics of datasets, which still need larger sample sizes and more influential predictors to accumulate evidence.
...
Julkaisija
Frontiers Media SAISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2297-055XAsiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/159095588
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Effect of variable selection strategy on the predictive models for adverse pregnancy outcomes of pre-eclampsia : A retrospective study
Zheng, Dongying; Hao, Xinyu; Khan, Muhanmmad; Kang, Fuli; Li, Fan; Hämäläinen, Timo; Wang, Lixia (Scholar Media Publishing Company, 2024)Objectives: The improvement of prediction for adverse pregnancy outcomes is quite essential to the women suffering from pre-eclampsia, while the collection of predictive indicators is the prerequisite. The traditional ... -
Comparison of three ordinal logistic regression methods for predicting person’s self-assessed health status with functional, haemodynamic covariates
Markkanen, Merri-Lotta (2023)Lääketieteen parissa perinteiset kyselytutkimukset ovat yhä suosittuja, jonka myötä myös järjestysasteikollisten muuttujien analyysia suoritetaan paljon. Modernin teknologian kehittyminen näkyy kuitenkin myös tällä ... -
Comparing the forecasting performance of logistic regression and random forest models in criminal recidivism
Aaltonen, Olli-Pekka (2016)Rikosseuraamusalalla on viime vuosina kehitetty uusintarikollisuutta ennustavia malleja (Tyni, 2015), jotka perustuvat tyypillisesti rekisteripohjaisiin mittareihin, jotka mittaavat mm. tuomitun sukupuolta, ikää, rikostaustaa ... -
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Hao, Xinyu; Zheng, Dongying; Khan, Muhanmmad; Wang, Lixia; Hämäläinen, Timo; Cong, Fengyu; Xu, Hongming; Song, Kedong (MDPI, 2023)Predicting adverse outcomes is essential for pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to minimize risks. Applying statistical analysis may be limited for the small sample size of childbearing patients, while ... -
Predicting Children's Myopia Risk : A Monte Carlo Approach to Compare the Performance of Machine Learning Models
Artiemjew, Piotr; Cybulski, Radosław; Emamian, Mohammad; Grzybowski, Andrzej; Jankowski, Andrzej; Lanca, Carla; Mehravaran, Shiva; Młyński, Marcin; Morawski, Cezary; Nordhausen, Klaus; Pärssinen, Olavi; Ropiak, Krzysztof (SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, 2024)This study presents the initial results of the Myopia Risk Calculator (MRC) Consortium, introducing an innovative approach to predict myopia risk by using trustworthy machine-learning models. The dataset included approximately ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.