Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlattert, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorHartikainen, Markus
dc.contributor.authorBurgas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPotterf, Maria
dc.contributor.authorLukkarinen, Jani
dc.contributor.authorSnäll, Tord
dc.contributor.authorToraño-Caicoya, Astor
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T13:06:33Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T13:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBlattert, C., Eyvindson, K., Hartikainen, M., Burgas, D., Potterf, M., Lukkarinen, J., Snäll, T., Toraño-Caicoya, A., & Mönkkönen, M. (2022). Sectoral policies cause incoherence in forest management and ecosystem service provisioning. <i>Forest Policy and Economics</i>, <i>136</i>, Article 102689. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102689</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_103931545
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/79498
dc.description.abstractVarious national policies guide forest use, but often with competing policy objectives leading to divergent management paradigms. Incoherent policies may negatively impact the sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services (FES), and forest multifunctionality. There is uncertainty among policymakers about the impacts of policies on the real world. We translated the policy documents of Finland into scenarios including the quantitative demands for FES, representing: the national forest strategy (NFS), the biodiversity strategy (BDS), and the bioeconomy strategy (BES). We simulated a Finland-wide systematic sample of forest stands with alternative management regimes and climate change. Finally, we used multi-objective optimization to identify the combination of management regimes matching best with each policy scenario and analysed their long-term effects on FES. The NFS scenario proved to be the most multifunctional, targeting the highest number of FES, while the BES had the lowest FES targets. However, the NFS was strongly oriented towards the value chain of wood and bioenergy and had a dominating economic growth target, which caused strong within-policy conflicts and hindered reaching biodiversity targets. The BDS and BES scenarios were instead more consistent but showed either sustainability gaps in terms of providing timber resources (BDS) or no improvements in forest biodiversity (BES). All policy scenarios resulted in forest management programs dominated by continuous cover forestry, set-aside areas, and intensive management zones, with proportions depending on the policy focus. Our results highlight for the first time the conflicts among national sectoral policies in terms of management requirements and effects on forest multifunctionality. The outcomes provide leverage points for policymakers to increase coherence among future policies and improve implementation of multiple uses of forests.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesForest Policy and Economics
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherforest policy
dc.subject.otherecosystem services
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.othermulti-objective optimization
dc.subject.otherforest management
dc.subject.otherclimate change
dc.titleSectoral policies cause incoherence in forest management and ecosystem service provisioning
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202201241273
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1389-9341
dc.relation.volume136
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber326321
dc.relation.grantnumber326309
dc.subject.ysomonitavoiteoptimointi
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysometsäpolitiikka
dc.subject.ysoilmastonmuutokset
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subject.ysoskenaariot
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysomonimuotoisuus
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.subject.ysokestävä kehitys
dc.subject.ysometsiensuojelu
dc.subject.ysometsätalous
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p32016
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11339
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5729
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3296
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14084
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8470
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p18321
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1861
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102689
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET Programmesen
jyx.fundingprogramJoint International Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET, artikla 174 -ohjelmatfi
jyx.fundingprogramKV-yhteishanke, SAfi
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was conducted within the project MultiForest, which is supported under the umbrella of ERA-NET Cofund ForestValue by: Academy of Finland (aka 326321), Business Finland, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment & Water Management (Austria), Agency for Renewable Resources (Germany), Research Council of Norway, Vinnova (2018-04982; Sweden). ForestValue has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement N° 773324. Finally, the study received funding through the 2017-2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net Cofund program, and with the funding organisation Academy of Finland (aka 326309).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0