Comparing interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization methods with an artificial decision maker
Afsar, B., Ruiz, A. B., & Miettinen, K. (2023). Comparing interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization methods with an artificial decision maker. Complex & Intelligent systems, 9(2), 1165-1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00586-5
Julkaistu sarjassa
Complex & Intelligent systemsPäivämäärä
2023Oppiaine
Laskennallinen tiedeMultiobjective Optimization GroupPäätöksen teko monitavoitteisestiComputational ScienceMultiobjective Optimization GroupDecision analytics utilizing causal models and multiobjective optimizationTekijänoikeudet
© 2021 the Authors
Solving multiobjective optimization problems with interactive methods enables a decision maker with domain expertise to direct the search for the most preferred trade-offs with preference information and learn about the problem. There are different interactive methods, and it is important to compare them and find the best-suited one for solving the problem in question. Comparisons with real decision makers are expensive, and artificial decision makers (ADMs) have been proposed to simulate humans in basic testing before involving real decision makers. Existing ADMs only consider one type of preference information. In this paper, we propose ADM-II, which is tailored to assess several interactive evolutionary methods and is able to handle different types of preference information. We consider two phases of interactive solution processes, i.e., learning and decision phases separately, so that the proposed ADM-II generates preference information in different ways in each of them to reflect the nature of the phases. We demonstrate how ADM-II can be applied with different methods and problems. We also propose an indicator to assess and compare the performance of interactive evolutionary methods.
...
Julkaisija
Springer Science+Business MediaISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2199-4536Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/102421429
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Rahoittaja(t)
Suomen AkatemiaRahoitusohjelmat(t)
Akatemiahanke, SA; Profilointi, SALisätietoja rahoituksesta
The authors would like to thank the financial support received from the Spanish government (Grant ECO2017-88883-R), the regional government of Andalusia (Grant UMA18-FEDERJA-024 and PAI group SEJ-532), and the Academy of Finland (Grants 322221 and 311877).Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Desirable properties of performance indicators for assessing interactive evolutionary multiobjective optimization methods
Aghaei Pour, Pouya; Bandaru, Sunith; Afsar, Bekir; Miettinen, Kaisa (ACM, 2022)Interactive methods support decision makers in finding the most preferred solution in multiobjective optimization problems. They iteratively incorporate the decision maker's preference information to find the best balance ... -
A New Paradigm in Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
Saini, Bhupinder Singh; Hakanen, Jussi; Miettinen, Kaisa (Springer, 2020)Over the years, scalarization functions have been used to solve multiobjective optimization problems by converting them to one or more single objective optimization problem(s). This study proposes a novel idea of solving ... -
Integration of lot sizing and safety strategy placement using interactive multiobjective optimization
Kania, Adhe; Sipilä, Juha; Misitano, Giovanni; Miettinen, Kaisa; Lehtmäki, Jussi (Elsevier, 2022)We address challenges of unpredicted demand and propose a multiobjective optimization model to integrate a lot sizing problem with safety strategy placement and optimize conflicting objectives simultaneously. The novel ... -
Towards explainable interactive multiobjective optimization : R-XIMO
Misitano, Giovanni; Afsar, Bekir; Lárraga, Giomara; Miettinen, Kaisa (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022)In interactive multiobjective optimization methods, the preferences of a decision maker are incorporated in a solution process to find solutions of interest for problems with multiple conflicting objectives. Since multiple ... -
An Approach to the Automatic Comparison of Reference Point-Based Interactive Methods for Multiobjective Optimization
Podkopaev, Dmitry; Miettinen, Kaisa; Ojalehto, Vesa (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2021)Solving multiobjective optimization problems means finding the best balance among multiple conflicting objectives. This needs preference information from a decision maker who is a domain expert. In interactive methods, the ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.