Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources
Marttunen, M., Salminen, T., & Utriainen, J. (2021). Student evaluations of the credibility and argumentation of online sources. Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1929052
Published inJournal of Educational Research
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
This study investigated upper secondary school students’ skills in evaluating the credibility and argumentative content of a blog text and a YouTube video. Both sources concerned child vaccination, the blog text opposing and the YouTube video supporting it. Students rated each source as credible, fairly credible or non-credible, justified their ratings, and analyzed the argumentation of both sources. Their justifications were analyzed for trustworthiness and expertise and their argument analyses for identification of the main position of the source and the reasons supporting it. Students’ justification skills proved fairly weak, and they also struggled with recognizing unbalanced argumentation. Students’ skill in analyzing the argumentation used in the sources also proved inadequate, especially in the blog text task. Overall academic achievement significantly predicted students’ credibility evaluation and argument analysis skills. The results suggest that greater emphasis should be placed on tasks involving the interpretation and analysis of online information. ...
ISSN Search the Publication Forum0022-0671
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Related funder(s)Academy of Finland
Funding program(s)Academy Project, AoF
Additional information about fundingAcademy of Finland (Project 285 817).
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Students' abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts : The role of internet‐specific epistemic justifications Hämäläinen, Elina K.; Kiili, Carita; Räikkönen, Eija; Marttunen, Miika (Wiley, 2021)Previous evaluation studies have rarely used authentic online texts and investigated upper secondary school students' use of evaluation criteria and deep reasoning. The associations between internet-specific epistemic ...
The effect of instructions on writing an argumentative text : a study on upper secondary school students' written performance in English Keskitalo, Venla (2014)Tietoyhteiskunnan kehitys heijastuu tulevina vuosina myös ylioppilastutkintoihin, sillä vuodesta 2016 alkaen ensimmäiset ylioppilaskirjoitukset suoritetaan sähköisesti tietokoneita hyödyntäen. Myös englannin kielen opetukselle ...
Students’ Interpretations of a Persuasive Multimodal Video About Vaccines Kiili, Carita; Smith, Blaine E.; Räikkönen, Eija; Marttunen, Miika (SAGE Publications, 2021)The present study investigated students’ (N = 404) interpretations of the main message and use of modes in a persuasive multimodal video on vaccines. It also examined whether students’ topic knowledge, language arts grades, ...
Investigating elementary school students’ text-based argumentation with multiple online information resources Kiili, Carita; Bråten, Ivar; Kullberg, Nina; Leppänen, Paavo H.T. (Elsevier Ltd, 2020)In this study, we explored how elementary school students used multiple information resources in responding to a text-based argumentation task asking them to research a set of online texts in order to state and justify ...
Transmediating argumentation : Students composing across written essays and digital videos in higher education Smith, Blaine E.; Kiili, Carita; Kauppinen, Merja (Pergamon, 2016)This comparative study examined how university students built an argument in written essays and multimodal digital videos, and how their argumentation transmediated across these two mediums. Data analysis involved 1) ...