How and Why ‘Theory’ Is Often Misunderstood in Information Systems Literature
Siponen, M., & Klaavuniemi, T. (2019). How and Why ‘Theory’ Is Often Misunderstood in Information Systems Literature. In ICIS 2019 : Proceedings the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (Article 1497). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/research_methods/research_methods/3/
Date
2019Copyright
© 2019 the Authors
IS theory accounts have increased our understanding of scientific theories. However, many influential theory accounts in Information Systems (IS) are influenced by the Received View of scientific theory (RV), which flourished in the philosophy of science around 1930-1969. The RV has been widely rejected in the philosophy of science, as the theory ignored much of the actual scientific context, and it mischaracterized several important characteristics of scientific research and theories. Although RV ideas were crafted for philosophers’ philosophical purposes, and not for scientists’ use, several IS scholars seem to believe that some of the RV theses represent actual (good or strong) scientific theories. Mistaking problematic logical reconstructions by philosophers for “real” scientific theories may seriously impede IS research. Recognizing how some of the RV theses may mislead the IS research will hopefully help us to value other types of research contributions that may not meet the current ‘theory’ conventions.
...
Publisher
Association for Information SystemsParent publication ISBN
978-0-9966831-9-7Conference
International Conference on Information SystemsIs part of publication
ICIS 2019 : Proceedings the 40th International Conference on Information SystemsISSN Search the Publication Forum
1026-1079Keywords
Original source
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/research_methods/research_methods/3/Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/33067819
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism : Response to Lee’s Commentary
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2020)We respond to Lee’s (forthcoming) commentary on our article “Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism” (Siponen & Tsohou [S&T], 2018). Lee offers four arguments against our analyses and conclusions in S&T ... -
Demystifying the Influential IS Legends of Positivism
Siponen, Mikko; Tsohou, Aggeliki (Association for Information Systems, 2018)Positivism has been used to establish a standard that Information Systems (IS) research must meet to be scientific. According to such positivistic beliefs in IS, scientific research should: 1) be generalizable, 2) focus ... -
Why is the hypothetico-deductive (H-D) method in information systems not an H-D method?
Siponen, Mikko; Klaavuniemi, Tuula (Elsevier, 2020)The hypothetico-deductive (H-D) method is reported to be common in information systems (IS). In IS, the H-D method is often presented as a Popperian, Hempelian, or natural science method. However, there are many fundamental ... -
An information system design product theory for the class of eSourcing requirements, delivery and completion management systems for eSourcing service providers
Lu, Yikun (University of Jyväskylä, 2015) -
Closed Theories, Falsificationism and Non-Cumulative Progress
Firsova, Svitlana; Bilorus, Tetiana; Aksom, Herman (Vilnius University Press, 2020)It is argued that scientific progress occurs not with the cumulative growth of knowledge or when theories get closer to the truth but with discovering new domains and new theories that fit these domains. This horizontal ...