Three Dimensions of Dialogicity in Dialogic Argumentation
Hähkiöniemi, M., Lehesvuori, S., Nieminen, P., Hiltunen, J., & Jokiranta, K. (2019). Three Dimensions of Dialogicity in Dialogic Argumentation. Studia Paedagogica, 24(4), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2019-4-9
Published in
Studia PaedagogicaAuthors
Date
2019Discipline
Matematiikka ja luonnontieteetKoulutuksen tutkimuslaitosMatematiikka ja luonnontieteetFinnish Institute for Educational ResearchCopyright
© 2019 the Authors
Three dimensions of dialogicity are emphasised in the literature: dialogic teacher talk, students' dialogic moves and organising for dialogic teaching. In this article, we examine these dimensions and the interplay between them in supporting dialogic argumentation in the context of whole-class discussions in mathematics and physics. Three seemingly different seventh-grade lessons were selected for further analysis from the database of a research project on dialogic argumentation. In this paper, we focus on whole-class discussions after a group assignment. The lessons were video recorded with multiple cameras and transcribed. We characterised dialogic features of teacher talk, more general teacher decisions and organising for dialogic teaching, as well as students' dialogic and justifying moves. In addition, we examined how these were connected. According to the results, the three dimensions of dialogicity played out differently in the lessons. Furthermore, the results give insights into the interplay of the three dialogicity dimensions and students' justifying moves in dialogic argumentation.
...
Publisher
Masarykova univerzitaISSN Search the Publication Forum
1803-7437Keywords
Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/34986861
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Related funder(s)
Research Council of FinlandFunding program(s)
Academy Project, AoFAdditional information about funding
This work has been funded by the Academy of Finland (project number 286576).License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Experimenting with the structured assessment dialogue in physics and mathematics classes
Nieminen, Pasi; Hähkiöniemi, Markus; Bruun, Jesper; Viiri, Jouni (Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association (FMSERA), 2017)This study deals with a formal, pre-planned teacher–student discussion, called structured assessment dialogue (SAD) that assesses students’ inquiry competences by combining formative and summative assessments. Six SAD ... -
Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics
Hähkiöniemi, Markus; Hiltunen, Jenna; Jokiranta, Kaisa; Kilpelä, Jonathan; Lehesvuori, Sami; Nieminen, Pasi (Elsevier, 2022)In this study, we focus on dialogic argumentation among students in a whole class setting in mathematics and physics in lower secondary school. By drawing on previous studies on the structure of argumentation and dialogic ... -
Argumentation in the Context of High School Mathematics : Examining Dialogic Aspects of Argumentation
Hähkiöniemi, Markus (Springer, 2022)In this chapter, I examine argumentation from the perspective of dialogic argumentation that highlights students’ engagement with each other’s ideas in the process of making mathematical claims and providing evidence to ... -
Digital scaffold supporting dialogue and acquisition of academic language related to argumentation during online inquiry
Murphy, Victoria (2016)In the 21st century collaboration and the use of digital environments have been recognised as key areas of classroom ecology. Dialogue in particular has been highlighted as an important part of collaboration in many studies. ... -
Attending to and fostering argumentation in whole class discussion
Hähkiöniemi, Markus; Nieminen, Pasi; Lehesvuori, Sami; Francisco, John; Hiltunen, Jenna; Jokiranta, Kaisa; Viiri, Jouni (Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning (SMDF), 2018)Prior studies highlighted the importance of whole class discussion after student activities and have focused, for example, on teacher moves in supporting discussion. We characterize two processes in teacher-students ...