Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolzknecht, Franz
dc.contributor.authorHuhta, Ari
dc.contributor.authorLamprianou, Iasonas
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T08:01:54Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T21:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHolzknecht, F., Huhta, A., & Lamprianou, I. (2018). Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries. <i>Assessing Writing</i>, <i>37</i>, 57-67. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_28009630
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_77406
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64513
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated to what extent two teams of experienced raters from different European countries (Finland and Austria), using their own CEFR-based rating scale (one holistic and one analytic), agreed on the CEFR level of students’ writing performances. Both teams rated one hundred performances written by Austrian secondary school students based on two tasks. The Finnish raters (N = 3) applied a holistic CEFR-linked rating scale consisting of verbatim CEFR descriptors developed in Finland, while the Austrian team (N = 6) used an analytic CEFR-linked rating scale consisting of four criteria developed in Austria. The ratings were analysed using the Rasch model. Although there were individual differences in rater severity among both teams of raters, a clear pattern emerged from the data: The Austrian raters were slightly more lenient than the Finnish raters. Although there was a statistically significant difference in rater severity between the two groups, the actual scope of disagreement was small. Thus, overall, the two teams agreed to a large extent on the CEFR levels of the participants.fi
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAssessing Writing
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherCEFR levels
dc.subject.otherassessing writing
dc.subject.otherrating scales
dc.subject.otherrater effects
dc.titleComparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201905312886
dc.contributor.laitosSoveltavan kielentutkimuksen keskusfi
dc.contributor.laitosCentre for Applied Language Studiesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSoveltava kielitiede
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2019-05-31T06:15:15Z
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange57-67
dc.relation.issn1075-2935
dc.relation.numberinseries0
dc.relation.volume37
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokielitaito
dc.subject.ysokirjoittaminen
dc.subject.ysoarviointi
dc.subject.ysoRaschin malli
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5797
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2512
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7413
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24250
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0