Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health
Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. H. (2018). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 533-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
Published inReading and Writing
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2017. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
This study assessed the ability of 426 students (ages 12–13) to critically evaluate two types of online locations on health issues: an academic resource and a commercial resource. The results indicated limited evaluation abilities, especially for the commercial resource, and only a small, partial association with prior stance and offline reading ability. Only about half (51.4%) of the students questioned the credibility of the commercial online resource and only about 19% of the students showed an ability to fully recognize commercial bias. Wide variation existed in students’ ability to evaluate online information, as approximately one-fourth of the students performed poorly when evaluating the overall credibility of both online resources and one-fourth performed well. Logistic regression models showed that offline reading skills accounted for only 8.8% of the variance for the academic online resource and 15.1% of that for the commercial resource. No association appeared between evaluation and background knowledge, although an association with prior stance was observed for each online resource. The results are discussed in light of previous research and the need to pay greater attention to the critical evaluation of online resources during classroom instruction. ...
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Related funder(s)Academy of Finland
Funding program(s)Academy Programme, AoF
Additional information about fundingThis work was supported by the Academy of Finland (No. 274022). We are also grateful to Sini Hjelm, Sonja Tiri and Paula Rahkonen for their valuable work with the data collection and data management.
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Paakkari, Leena; Okan, Orkan (Institute for Healthcare Advancement, 2019)
Hämäläinen, Elina (Finra ry, 2020)Internetin tarjoama suuri määrä laadultaan vaihtelevaa informaatiota on tehnyt tiedon luotettavuuden arvioinnista entistä vaikeampaa. Tiedon alkuperä, laatu ja todenmukaisuus ovat usein epäselviä, mikä vaikeuttaa asiallisen ...
Kiili, Carita; Leu, Donald J. (Elsevier Ltd., 2019)This descriptive study sought to understand the complexities of integrative processing during collaborative online reading. Student pairs constructed a collaborative understanding while reading online information about a ...
Investigating elementary school students’ text-based argumentation with multiple online information resources Kiili, Carita; Bråten, Ivar; Kullberg, Nina; Leppänen, Paavo H.T. (Elsevier Ltd, 2020)In this study, we explored how elementary school students used multiple information resources in responding to a text-based argumentation task asking them to research a set of online texts in order to state and justify ...
Ethical issues in the teaching and learning of health topics in schools: the conceptions of teacher trainees Paakkari, Leena; Välimaa, Raili (Elsevier, 2013)There has been little research on how teacher trainees can be educated to deal with ethical issues, or on trainees' conceptions of these issues. Using written essays, this study aimed to examine health education teacher ...