Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKareksela, Santtu
dc.contributor.authorMoilanen, Atte
dc.contributor.authorRistaniemi, Olli
dc.contributor.authorVälivaara, Reima
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, Janne Sakari
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-05T12:29:07Z
dc.date.available2019-01-06T22:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationKareksela, S., Moilanen, A., Ristaniemi, O., Välivaara, R., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2018). Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making. <i>Conservation Biology</i>, <i>32</i>(1), 9-17. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13054</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_27358098
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_75727
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/56630
dc.description.abstractThe frequently discussed gap between conservation science and practice is manifest in the gap between spatial conservation prioritization plans and their implementation. We analyzed the research-implementation gap of one zoning case by comparing results of a spatial prioritization analysis aimed at avoiding ecological impact of peat mining in a regional zoning process with the final zoning plan. We examined the relatively complex planning process to determine the gaps among research, zoning, and decision making. We quantified the ecological costs of the differing trade-offs between ecological and socioeconomic factors included in the different zoning suggestions by comparing the landscape-level loss of ecological features (species occurrences, habitat area, etc.) between the different solutions for spatial allocation of peat mining. We also discussed with the scientists and planners the reasons for differing zoning suggestions. The implemented plan differed from the scientists suggestion in that its focus was individual ecological features rather than all the ecological features for which there were data; planners and decision makers considered effects of peat mining on areas not included in the prioritization analysis; zoning was not truly seen as a resource-allocation process and not emphasized in general minimizing ecological losses while satisfying economic needs (peat-mining potential); and decision makers based their prioritization of sites on site-level information showing high ecological value and on single legislative factors instead of finding a cost-effective landscape-level solution. We believe that if the zoning and decision-making processes are very complex, then the usefulness of science-based prioritization tools is likely to be reduced. Nevertheless, we found that high-end tools were useful in clearly exposing trade-offs between conservation and resource utilization.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesConservation Biology
dc.subject.otherconservation implementation
dc.subject.otherimpact avoidance
dc.subject.otherinverse resource allocation problem
dc.subject.otherpeat mining
dc.subject.otherreplacement cost
dc.subject.otherZonation software
dc.titleExposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201801051068
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)fi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Researchen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2018-01-05T07:15:14Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange9-17
dc.relation.issn0888-8892
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume32
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Wiley. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelu
dc.subject.ysoympäristöohjelmat
dc.subject.ysotaloudelliset vaikutukset
dc.subject.ysopäätöksenteko
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20376
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11238
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
dc.relation.doi10.1111/cobi.13054
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot