Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making
Kareksela, S., Moilanen, A., Ristaniemi, O., Välivaara, R., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2018). Exposing ecological and economic costs of the research-implementation gap and compromises in decision making. Conservation Biology, 32(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13054
Published inConservation Biology
DisciplineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiaEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Research
© 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Wiley. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
The frequently discussed gap between conservation science and practice is manifest in the gap between spatial conservation prioritization plans and their implementation. We analyzed the research-implementation gap of one zoning case by comparing results of a spatial prioritization analysis aimed at avoiding ecological impact of peat mining in a regional zoning process with the final zoning plan. We examined the relatively complex planning process to determine the gaps among research, zoning, and decision making. We quantified the ecological costs of the differing trade-offs between ecological and socioeconomic factors included in the different zoning suggestions by comparing the landscape-level loss of ecological features (species occurrences, habitat area, etc.) between the different solutions for spatial allocation of peat mining. We also discussed with the scientists and planners the reasons for differing zoning suggestions. The implemented plan differed from the scientists suggestion in that its focus was individual ecological features rather than all the ecological features for which there were data; planners and decision makers considered effects of peat mining on areas not included in the prioritization analysis; zoning was not truly seen as a resource-allocation process and not emphasized in general minimizing ecological losses while satisfying economic needs (peat-mining potential); and decision makers based their prioritization of sites on site-level information showing high ecological value and on single legislative factors instead of finding a cost-effective landscape-level solution. We believe that if the zoning and decision-making processes are very complex, then the usefulness of science-based prioritization tools is likely to be reduced. Nevertheless, we found that high-end tools were useful in clearly exposing trade-offs between conservation and resource utilization. ...
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Tohmo, Timo (University of Jyväskylä, 2007)This dissertation consists of nine empirical studies which seek to broaden understanding of Finnish regional economic structures. These studies are divided between two topics: 1) regional specialization and industrial ...
Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners’ preferences in boreal mire protection Nieminen, Eini; Kareksela, Santtu; Halme, Panu; Kotiaho, Janne Sakari (Springer, 2021)Private land often encompasses biodiversity features of high conservation value, but its protection is not straightforward. Commonly, landowners’ perspectives are rightfully allowed to influence conservation actions. This ...
Value-added bioproducts or renewable energy derived from lignin? : comparative regional economic and environmental impact assessment : case Metsä Group's bioproduct mill in Äänekoski Rannisto, Anna (2016)Metsä Group’s next-generation bioproduct mill in Äänekoski will be operational within Q3/2017 and it will have significant regional economic impact on Central Finland. The mill will operate applying principles of circular ...
Circular Economy Solution and their Economic Impacts in Construction Companies Operating in Finland Ojala, Henrik (2022)Kiertotalous on kokonaisvaltainen lähestymistapa talouskehitykseen. Se pyrkii vastaamaan globaaleihin haasteisiin, kuten ilmastonmuutokseen ja luonnon monimuotoisuuden köyhtymiseen irti kytkemällä ympäristöpaineet ...
Mazziotta, Adriano (University of Jyväskylä, 2014)