Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTriviño, María
dc.contributor.authorPohjanmies, Tähti
dc.contributor.authorMazziotta, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorJuutinen, Artti
dc.contributor.authorPodkopaev, Dmitry
dc.contributor.authorLe tortorec, Eric
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-07T05:43:28Z
dc.date.available2017-10-14T21:45:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationTriviño, María; Pohjanmies, Tähti; Mazziotta, Adriano; Juutinen, Artti; Podkopaev, Dmitry; Le tortorec, Eric; Mönkkönen, Mikko (2017). Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54 (1), 61-70. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12790
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_26279581
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_71524
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51834
dc.description.abstractThe boreal biome, representing approximately one-third of remaining global forests, provides a number of crucial ecosystem services. A particular challenge in forest ecosystems is to reconcile demand for an increased timber production with provisioning of other ecosystem services and biodiversity. However, there is still little knowledge about how forest management could help solve this challenge. Hence, studies that investigate how to manage forests to reduce trade-offs between ecosystem services and biodiversity are urgently needed to help forest owners and policy makers take informed decisions. We applied seven alternative forest management regimes using a forest growth simulator in a large boreal forest production landscape. First, we estimated the potential of the landscape to provide harvest revenues, store carbon and maintain biodiversity across a 50-year time period. Then, we applied multiobjective optimization to identify the trade-offs between these three objectives and to identify the optimal combination of forest management regimes to achieve these objectives. It was not possible to achieve high levels of either carbon storage or biodiversity if the objective of forest management was to maximize timber harvest revenues. Moreover, conflicts between biodiversity and carbon storage became stronger when simultaneously targeting high levels of timber revenues. However, with small reductions in timber revenues, it was possible to greatly increase the multifunctionality of the landscape, especially the biodiversity indicators. Forest management actions, alternative to business-as-usual management, such as reducing thinnings, extending the rotation period and increasing the amount of area set aside from forestry may be necessary to safeguard biodiversity and non-timber ecosystem services in Fennoscandia. Synthesis and applications. Our results show that no forest management regime alone is able to maximize timber revenues, carbon storage and biodiversity individually or simultaneously and that a combination of different regimes is needed to resolve the conflicts among these objectives. We conclude that it is possible to reduce the trade-offs between different objectives by applying diversified forest management planning at the boreal landscape level and that we need to give up the all-encompassing objective of very intensive timber production, which is prevailing particularly in Fennoscandian countries.en
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; British Ecological Society
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Applied Ecology
dc.subject.otherclimate change mitigation
dc.subject.otherclimate regulation
dc.subject.otherFinland
dc.subject.otherforest planning
dc.subject.othermultiobjective optimization
dc.subject.othertrade-offs
dc.titleOptimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201611044577
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2016-11-04T13:15:04Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange61-70
dc.relation.issn0021-8901
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume54
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Wiley. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber275329
dc.subject.ysohiilinielut
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysokestävä metsätalous
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.subject.ysometsätulot
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysopuunkorjuu
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21941
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24880
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10327
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14735
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
dc.relation.doi10.1111/1365-2664.12790
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderAcademy of Finlanden
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundinginformationWe are grateful to KONE Foundation and the Academy of Finland (Project 275329 to M.M.) for funding. Data were compiled and processed with funding from the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (Project 311159).


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record