Dealing with Complexity in Design Science Research : A Methodology Using Design Echelons
Tuunanen, T., Winter, R., & vom Brocke, J. (2024). Dealing with Complexity in Design Science Research : A Methodology Using Design Echelons. MIS Quarterly, 48(2), 427-458. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2023/16700
Julkaistu sarjassa
MIS QuarterlyPäivämäärä
2024Tekijänoikeudet
©2024. The Authors.
Design science research (DSR) aims to generate knowledge about innovative solutions to real-world problems. Consequently, DSR needs to deal with the complexity related to problem and solution spaces involving sociotechnical phenomena that people perceive differently and are subject to constant change. This complexity poses challenges to sequential, process-based approaches—specifically, the existing DSR methodology. We designed a DSR methodology that extends existing approaches by adding a complementary organizing logic to address complexity. Based on the theory of hierarchical, multilevel systems, we suggest organizing DSR based on the concept of “echelons”—meaning decomposing DSR projects into smaller logically coherent self-contained parts—and suggest a set of five design echelons that imply a hierarchical organizing logic for DSR projects. The echeloned DSR (eDSR) methodology was developed in five iterations, involving seven design and evaluation episodes.
Julkaisija
Society for Management Information SystemsISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
0276-7783Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/233433451
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Research Perspectives : Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Interpretive, Mixed Methods, and Design Science Research
Siponen, Mikko; Soliman, Wael; Holtkamp, Philipp (Association for Information Systems, 2021)Information systems (IS) scholars have proposed guidelines for interpretive, mixed methods, and design science research in IS. Because many of these guidelines are also suggested for evaluating what good or rigorous research ... -
Blurred lines of participation : nexus analytical tools for reflecting on the roles of researchers and participants in change-oriented research projects
Tumelius, Riikka; Legutko, Justyna; Intke-Hernandez, Minna; Vorobeva, Polina (Mouton De Gruyter, 2024)This article discusses nexus analysis (NA) as a research strategy that provides specific tools for reflecting on the roles of researchers and participants in participatory research. While many research traditions use ... -
Immersive Virtual Reality Education Application : Four Development Iterations along Design Science Research Methodology
Holopainen, Jani; Lähtevänoja, Antti; Tuunanen, Tuure (University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2022)This study introduces a research and development process of an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) education application. Altogether four application development iterations are showcased along the Design Science Research ... -
Reconsidering the Role of Research Method Guidelines for Qualitative, Mixed-methods, and Design Science Research
Holtkamp, Philipp; Soliman, Wael; Siponen, Mikko (University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2019)Guidelines for different qualitative research genres have been proposed in information systems (IS). As these guidelines are outlined for conducting and evaluating good research, studies may be denied publication ... -
Development of an Agile Requirements Risk Prioritization Method : A Design Science Research Study
Tuunanen, Tuure; Vartiainen, Tero; Kainulainen, Sanna; Ebrahim, Mehdi (Association for Information Systems, 2023)The practice of information systems development (ISD) has changed during the past two decades from very structured approaches to agile ISD methods. However, many methods available for managing requirements-related risks ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.