Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRostovtseva, Victoria V.
dc.contributor.authorPuurtinen, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Salinas, Emiliano
dc.contributor.authorCox, Ralf F. A.
dc.contributor.authorGroothuis, Antonius G. G.
dc.contributor.authorButovskaya, Marina L.
dc.contributor.authorWeissing, Franz J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T11:06:37Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T11:06:37Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationRostovtseva, V. V., Puurtinen, M., Méndez Salinas, E., Cox, R. F. A., Groothuis, A. G.G., Butovskaya, M. L., & Weissing, F. J. (2023). Unravelling the many facets of human cooperation in an experimental study. <i>Scientific Reports</i>, <i>13</i>, Article 19573. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46944-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46944-w</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_194530679
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/92014
dc.description.abstractHumans readily cooperate, even with strangers and without prospects of reciprocation. Despite thousands of studies, this finding is not well understood. Most studies focussed on a single aspect of cooperation and were conducted under anonymous conditions. However, cooperation is a multi-faceted phenomenon, involving generosity, readiness to share, fairness, trust, trustworthiness, and willingness to take cooperative risks. Here, we report findings of an experiment where subjects had to make decisions in ten situations representing different aspects of cooperation, both under anonymous and ‘personalised’ conditions. In an anonymous setting, we found considerable individual variation in each decision situation, while individuals were consistent both within and across situations. Prosocial tendencies such as generosity, trust, and trustworthiness were positively correlated, constituting a ‘cooperativeness syndrome’, but the tendency to punish non-cooperative individuals is not part of this syndrome. In a personalised setting, information on the appearance of the interaction partner systematically affected cooperation-related behaviour. Subjects were more cooperative toward interaction partners whose facial photographs were judged ‘generous’, ‘trustworthy’, ‘not greedy’, ‘happy’, ‘attractive’, and ‘not angry’ by a separate panel. However, individuals eliciting more cooperation were not more cooperative themselves in our experiment. Our study shows that a multi-faceted approach can reveal general behavioural tendencies underlying cooperation, but it also uncovers new puzzling features of human cooperation.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScientific Reports
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherhuman behaviour
dc.subject.othersocial anthropology
dc.titleUnravelling the many facets of human cooperation in an experimental study
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202311228030
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineHyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Wellbeingen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2045-2322
dc.relation.volume13
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2023
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokäyttäytymisen psykologia
dc.subject.ysopäätöksenteko
dc.subject.ysokäyttäytyminen
dc.subject.ysoyhteistyökyky
dc.subject.ysovuorovaikutus
dc.subject.ysoyhteistyö
dc.subject.ysoluottamus
dc.subject.ysososiaaliantropologia
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11310
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3625
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10592
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10591
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6334
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1725
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13839
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.datasethttps://doi.org/10.34894/VAEJSF
dc.relation.doi10.1038/s41598-023-46944-w
jyx.fundinginformationThe experiment was conducted with the support of the Dr. J.L. Dobberke Foundation, and the Erasmus Mundus Action 2 programme EMA2 Aurora II (2013–2021); the data analysis and manuscript preparation were supported by the grant 075-15-2022-328 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (on behalf of VVR, MLB). FJW acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant No. 789240).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0