Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorToraño Caicoya, Astor
dc.contributor.authorPoschenrieder, Werner
dc.contributor.authorBlattert, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorHartikainen, Markus
dc.contributor.authorBurgas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorUhl, Enno
dc.contributor.authorVergarechea, Marta
dc.contributor.authorPretzsch, Hans
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T09:12:46Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T09:12:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationToraño Caicoya, A., Poschenrieder, W., Blattert, C., Eyvindson, K., Hartikainen, M., Burgas, D., Mönkkönen, M., Uhl, E., Vergarechea, M., & Pretzsch, H. (2023). Sectoral policies as drivers of forest management and ecosystems services : A case study in Bavaria, Germany. <i>Land Use Policy</i>, <i>130</i>, Article 106673. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106673</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_182739048
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/86402
dc.description.abstractEuropean countries have national sectoral polices to regulate and promote the provision of a wide range of forest ecosystems services (FES). However, potential incoherencies among these policies can negatively affect the efficient provision of FES. In this work, we evaluated the coherence among three national policies from Germany and their ability to effectively provide FES in the future: the Forest Strategy 2020 (FS), the National Strategy on Biological Diversity (BDS), and the German National Policy Strategy on Bioeconomy (BES). Using forest inventory data from the Federal State of Bavaria, we simulated a range of forest management options under three climate trajectories for 100 years into the future (2012–2112). Then, with multi-objective optimization, we translated each policy into a specific scenario and identified the best combination of management regimes that maximizes the targets defined in each policy scenario. The three policies were vague in the definition of FES. The FS was the most comprehensive policy aiming for a higher degree of multifunctionality, whereas the BES and BDS focused on less FES. The FS and the BDS showed the highest coherence, while the BES showed a stronger focus on timber production. As a result, the optimal management programs of FS and BDS showed high integration, with a dominance of Continuous Cover Forestry (CCF), and certain shares of set asides. Climate change led to an increase of set aside areas due to increased productivity. In the BES, the share of land among management regimes was strongly segregated between CCF and rotation forestry. Our policy coherence analysis showed that achieving a multifunctional provision of FES requires policy coherence, fostering a diverse management of the landscape that mainly takes advantage of integrative management, like CCF, but also segregates important parts of the landscape for intensive use and set asides. Nevertheless, the current high standing volumes in Bavaria will pose an additional risk to implement such management.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLand Use Policy
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.othermulti-objective optimization
dc.subject.otherforest management
dc.subject.otherclimate change
dc.subject.otherforest policy
dc.subject.otherscenario analysis
dc.titleSectoral policies as drivers of forest management and ecosystems services : A case study in Bavaria, Germany
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202304182526
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0264-8377
dc.relation.volume130
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
dc.subject.ysometsäpolitiikka
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysomonitavoiteoptimointi
dc.subject.ysoskenaariot
dc.subject.ysoilmastonmuutokset
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11339
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p32016
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3296
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5729
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106673
jyx.fundinginformationThis work has been conducted in the frame of the MultiForest project. Project MultiForest is supported under the umbrella of ERA-NET Cofund ForestValue by Academy of Finland, Business Finland, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment & Water Management (Austria), Agency for Renewable Resources (Germany), Research Council of Norway, Vinnova/Formas/SWEA (Sweden). ForestValue has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement N° 773324.
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0