Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaunumäki, Minna
dc.contributor.authorMaunula, Minna
dc.contributor.authorHarju-Luukkainen, Heidi
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T07:34:07Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T07:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationMaunumäki, M., Maunula, M., & Harju-Luukkainen, H. (2022). Difficult but Valuable! Learning in Student-centered Assessment Feedback Practices in Higher Education. <i>Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science</i>, <i>35</i>(11), 20-37. <a href="https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2022/v35i1130467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2022/v35i1130467</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_157014716
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/83511
dc.description.abstractAims: The aim of this study is to fill a gap in research on students' experiences of learning in student-centered assessment feedback practices. The article examines what students tell us about their learning in the context of student-centered feedback practices in higher education during online learning. Study Design: The study was conducted as a qualitative online survey among Finnish university students (N=35). The relationship between learning and assessment was explored in the context of formative and summative assessment practices during an online learning environment. The data was analysed using a discursive approach. Place and Duration of Study: The research was conducted in Finland during spring 2021. Methodology: The scientific and philosophical framework of the study is based on the theory of social constructionism, according to which social reality is formed through language in an interaction between people. The methodology used was discursive reading, i.e., how social reality is discursively produced through language. The starting point was the idea that language creates different discourses or perspectives on reality. Results: The feedback practices provided a different picture of learning and highlighted different dimensions of learning. Learning was discussed in terms of positive emotions, multiple perspectives, sociality, renewal, and holistic learning. In addition, negative emotions, disinformation, regression, and the playing field metaphor were associated with learning. Conclusion: The results show that feedback practices that are presented as student-centered do not necessarily support the learning process of adults. Learning and assessment practices based on pedagogy and a learning theory can best support students' personal and social growth and increase their self-esteem. In online learning, teacher guidance and pedagogically based learning support are emphasized. We argue that in online-learning, where the role of the teacher is often small, student-centered well-intentioned assessment practices can only provide a thin veneer of learning unless students are helped to see the holistic importance of assessment as part of the learning process.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSciencedomain International
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherassessment
dc.subject.otheronline learning
dc.subject.otherhigher education
dc.subject.othercontinuous learning
dc.titleDifficult but Valuable! Learning in Student-centered Assessment Feedback Practices in Higher Education
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202210114837
dc.contributor.laitosKokkolan yliopistokeskus Chydeniusfi
dc.contributor.laitosAvoin yliopistofi
dc.contributor.laitosKokkola University Consortium Chydeniusen
dc.contributor.laitosOpen Universityen
dc.contributor.oppiaineKasvatustieteiden yksikköfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineAvoin yliopisto (KYC)fi
dc.contributor.oppiaineThe Unit of Educationen
dc.contributor.oppiaineOpen university (KYC)en
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange20-37
dc.relation.issn2456-981X
dc.relation.numberinseries11
dc.relation.volume35
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 Minna et al.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.subject.ysoverkko-opetus
dc.subject.ysopalaute
dc.subject.ysoaikuisopiskelijat
dc.subject.ysokorkea-asteen koulutus
dc.subject.ysooppimisprosessi
dc.subject.ysojatkuva koulutus
dc.subject.ysoarviointi
dc.subject.ysoverkko-oppiminen
dc.subject.ysoitsearviointi
dc.subject.ysososiaalinen konstruktivismi
dc.subject.ysovertaisarviointi (arviointimenetelmät)
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6621
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1236
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25875
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3390
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5103
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14966
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7413
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13627
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6253
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17923
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9740
dc.rights.urlhttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.relation.doi10.9734/JESBS/2022/v35i1130467
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0