Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorWatts, Phillip C.
dc.contributor.authorMappes, Tapio
dc.contributor.authorTukalenko, Eugene
dc.contributor.authorMousseau, Timothy A.
dc.contributor.authorBoratyński, Zbyszek
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Anders P.
dc.contributor.authorLavrinienko, Anton
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T12:47:55Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T12:47:55Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWatts, P. C., Mappes, T., Tukalenko, E., Mousseau, T. A., Boratyński, Z., Møller, A. P., & Lavrinienko, A. (2022). Interpretation of gut microbiota data in the ‘eye of the beholder’ : A commentary and re‐evaluation of data from ‘Impacts of radiation exposure on the bacterial and fungal microbiome of small mammals in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone’. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i>, <i>91</i>(7), 1535-1545. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13667</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_147102284
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/82107
dc.description.abstract1. Evidence that exposure to environmental pollutants can alter the gut microbiota composition of wildlife includes studies of rodents exposed to radionuclides. 2. Antwis et al. (2021) used amplicon sequencing to characterise the gut microbiota of four species of rodent (Myodes glareolus, Apodemus agrarius, A. flavicollis and A. sylvaticus) inhabiting the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) to examine possible changes in gut bacteria (microbiota) and gut fungi (mycobiota) associated with exposure to radionuclides and whether the sample type (from caecum or faeces) affected the analysis. 3. The conclusions derived from the analyses of gut mycobiota are based on data that represent a mixture of ingested fungi (e.g. edible macrofungi, polypores, lichens and ectomycorrhizae) and gut mycobiota (e.g. microfungi and yeasts), which mask the patterns of inter- and intraspecific variation in the authentic gut mycobiota. 4. Implying that ‘faecal samples are not an accurate indicator of gut composition’ creates an unnecessary controversy about faecal sampling because the comparison of samples from the caecum and faeces confounds many other possible drivers (including different animals from different locations, sampled in different years) of variation in gut microbiota. 5. It is relevant also that Antwis et al.'s (2021) data lack statistical power to detect an effect of exposure to radionuclides on the gut microbiota because (1) all of their samples of Apodemus mice had experienced a medium or high total absorbed dose rate and (2) they did not collect samples of bank voles (M. glareolus) from replicate contaminated and uncontaminated locations. 6. Discussion of Antwis et al.'s (2021) analysis, especially the claims presented in the Abstract, is important to prevent controversy about the outcome of research on the biological impacts of wildlife inhabiting the CEZ.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Animal Ecology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otheramplicon sequencing
dc.subject.otherdiet
dc.subject.othermicrobiota
dc.subject.othermycobiota
dc.subject.otherradiation effects
dc.titleInterpretation of gut microbiota data in the ‘eye of the beholder’ : A commentary and re‐evaluation of data from ‘Impacts of radiation exposure on the bacterial and fungal microbiome of small mammals in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone’
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202206293707
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1535-1545
dc.relation.issn0021-8790
dc.relation.numberinseries7
dc.relation.volume91
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.relation.grantnumber268670
dc.relation.grantnumber324602
dc.subject.ysojyrsijät
dc.subject.ysoradioaktiivinen säteily
dc.subject.ysosäteilybiologia
dc.subject.ysoluonnonvaraiset eläimet
dc.subject.ysosuolistomikrobisto
dc.subject.ysoTšernobylin ydinonnettomuus
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3571
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p458
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1781
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6917
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p37925
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p29517
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1111/1365-2656.13667
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundinginformationAcademy of Finland, Grant/Award Number: 287153, 324602, 268670 and 324604; Oskar Öflund Stiftelse; Samuel Freeman Charitable Trust; Scholarship Fund of the University of Oulu; University of Oulu Graduate School doctoral programme
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0