Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting : A review
Tupala, A.-K., Huttunen, S., & Halme, P. (2022). Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting : A review. Biological Conservation, 267, Article 109431. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109431
Published inBiological Conservation
DisciplineResurssiviisausyhteisöYhteiskuntapolitiikkaSosiologiaEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiaSchool of Resource WisdomSocial and Public PolicySosiologyEcology and Evolutionary Biology
© 2022 the Authors
Biodiversity offsetting is the widely studied last step of the mitigation hierarchy. Despite numerous studies and the methodological development completed for biodiversity calculations, the human aspect remains unsolved. Biodiversity conservation is typically governed at national or state levels, but the harm caused to biodiversity as well as people occurs locally. In biodiversity offsetting, biodiversity values can be relocated far from the original area, but relocating the values people hold regarding their nearby nature may not be possible. Acknowledging the local people's hopes and values may further complicate biodiversity offsetting, therefore it emphasises even more the need to avoid and reduce the negative impacts, i.e. the earlier steps of mitigation hierarchy. In this review we present the current understanding of the social impacts on biodiversity offsetting based on scientific literature. We identified a clear research gap in relation to the opportunities local people have to participate in decision-making processes related to biodiversity offsetting. Biodiversity offsetting can cause the displacement of local people and negatively affect their livelihood, but there is little literature on that aspect of the offsetting procedure. In addition, biodiversity offsetting can cause loss of livelihood or living area in the Global South while impacts in the Global North are often more indirect. Ways to compensate the losses to local people vary from land use rights in other areas to economic compensation. It is unclear if there are offsetting protocols which are acceptable both socially and in terms of biodiversity. ...
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Additional information about fundingWe thank the Kone Foundation (decision number 21 0000 40481) for supporting our study.
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Moilanen, Atte; Kotiaho, Janne S. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2021)Biodiversity offsetting is the practice of using conservation actions such as habitat restoration, management or protection to compensate for ecological losses caused by development activity, including construction projects. ...
Kortetmäki, Teea; Kotiaho, Janne; Hytönen, Jonne; Näyhä, Annukka; Tupala, Anna-Kaisa; Baumeister, Stefan; Käppi, Matleena; Purhonen, Jenna; El Geneidy, Sami; Kuusiaho, Viivi; Silonsaari, Jonne; Matthies, Aila-Leena; Säynäjäkangas, Janne; Ratinen, Ilkka; Veijola, Soile; Mattila, Hanna; Järvensivu, Paavo (Jyväskylän yliopisto, JYU.Wisdom - School of Resource Wisdom, 2020)
Tuulentie, Seija (Jyväskylän yliopisto, Helsinki : Minerva, 2009)
Duflot, Rémi; Baumeister, Stefan; Burgas, Daniel; Eyvindson, Kyle; Triviño, María; Blattert, Clemens; Kuparinen, Anna; Potterf, Mária (Springer, 2021)COVID-19 crisis has emphasized how poorly prepared humanity is to cope with global disasters. However, this crisis also offers a unique opportunity to move towards a more sustainable and equitable future. Here, we identify ...
Moilanen, Atte; Kotiaho, Janne Sakari (Elsevier Ltd., 2018)Many development projects, whether they are about construction of factories, mines, roads, railways, new suburbs, shopping malls, or even individual houses, have negative environmental consequences. Biodiversity offsetting ...