Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets
Moilanen, A., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2021). Three ways to deliver a net positive impact with biodiversity offsets. Conservation Biology, 35(5), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13533
Published inConservation Biology
DisciplineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)ResurssiviisausyhteisöEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiaCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary ResearchSchool of Resource WisdomEcology and Evolutionary Biology
© 2020 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology
Biodiversity offsetting is the practice of using conservation actions such as habitat restoration, management or protection to compensate for ecological losses caused by development activity, including construction projects. The typical goal of offsetting is no net loss (NNL), which means that all ecological losses are compensated for by commensurate offset gains. The focus of this work is a conceptual and methodological exploration of net positive impact (NPI), an ambitious goal that implies commitment to beyond NNL, and which has recently received increasing attention from both big business and environmental NGOs. We build upon three ways to deliver NPI: (i) use of an additional NPI multiplier, (ii) using permanent offsets to deliver additional gains after NNL has first been reached during a shorter offset evaluation time interval, and a (iii) novel modification of the mitigation hierarchy so that gains from its traditional third step, onsite rehabilitation, can no longer be counted towards reduced offset requirements. The outcome from these three factors is that for the same ecological damage, larger offsets will be required than before, and earlier, thereby necessarily improving the success expected from offsets. As a corollary, we show how offsets really are NNL only at one ephemeral point in time, before which they are net negative and after which they turn into either net positive impact or net negative impact, depending on whether permanent offsets are combined with partially temporary losses or if temporary offset gains are combined with partially permanent losses. While we provide operational guidance on how to achieve NPI, it should be understood that achieving it is fully conditional on prior achievement of NNL, and offsets have indeed been frequently observed to fail due to inadequate policy requirements, incompetent planning or incomplete implementation. Nevertheless, achieving NPI becomes straightforward if NNL can be credibly reached first. ...
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Additional information about fundingA.M. was supported by the Strategic Research Council project IBC-Carbon, grant #312559.
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Precision, Applicability, and Economic Implications : A Comparison of Alternative Biodiversity Offset Indexes Kangas, Johanna; Kullberg, Peter; Pekkonen, Minna; Kotiaho, Janne S.; Ollikainen, Markku (Springer Science+Business Media, 2021)The rates of ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss are alarming and current conservation efforts are not sufficient to stop them. The need for new tools is urgent. One approach is biodiversity offsetting: a developer ...
Tupala, Anna-Kaisa; Huttunen, Suvi; Halme, Panu (Elsevier BV, 2022)Biodiversity offsetting is the widely studied last step of the mitigation hierarchy. Despite numerous studies and the methodological development completed for biodiversity calculations, the human aspect remains unsolved. ...
The quantitative effect of emphasized impact avoidance in zoning and distance of edge influence on required biodiversity offsets Pykäläinen, Essi (2023)Kasvaneen maankäytön ja ihmistoiminnan myötä luonnon monimuotoisuus on vähentynyt merkittävästi viime vuosikymmeninä. Elinympäristöjen tuhoutuminen, pirstoutuminen ja laadun heikentyminen ajaa yhä useamman lajin kohti ...
Environmental mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets revisited through habitat connectivity modelling Bergès, Laurent; Avon, Catherine; Bezombes, Lucie; Clauzel, Céline; Duflot, Rémi; Foltête, Jean-Christophe; Gaucherand, Stéphanie; Girardet, Xavier; Spiegelberger, Thoma (Elsevier, 2020)Biodiversity loss is accelerating because of unceasing human activity and land clearing for development projects (urbanisation, transport infrastructure, mining and quarrying …). Environmental policy-makers and managers ...
Moilanen, Atte; Kotiaho, Janne Sakari (Elsevier Ltd., 2018)Many development projects, whether they are about construction of factories, mines, roads, railways, new suburbs, shopping malls, or even individual houses, have negative environmental consequences. Biodiversity offsetting ...