The demand for IPR services - to use or not to use a professional representative?
Heikkilä, J. (2021). The demand for IPR services - to use or not to use a professional representative?. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 11(3), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2020.10033293
Julkaistu sarjassa
International Journal of Intellectual Property ManagementTekijät
Päivämäärä
2021Tekijänoikeudet
© Inderscience Publishers, 2021
We analysed the use of professional representative services and related outcomes in patent, utility model, design right and trademark filings. We found that: 1) there is a positive association between the use of a professional representative and the likelihood of grant or registration; 2) the demand for professional intellectual property rights (IPR) services is heterogeneous between IPR types: applicants are most likely to hire professional representatives (IPR agents and attorneys) for patents, followed by utility models, design rights and trademarks; 3) individual applicants are less likely to use professional representatives compared to firm applicants.
Julkaisija
Inderscience PublishersISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1478-9647Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/47027204
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Kauppakorkeakoulu [1359]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
IPR-aineistojen mahdollisuuksia, replikointitarpeita ja teknisiä haasteita
Heikkilä, Jussi (Informaatiotutkimuksen yhdistys, 2021)Tässä artikkelissa tehdään katsaus aineettomien oikeuksien eli IPR- (intellectual property rights) aineistoihin erityisesti suomalaisesta ja eurooppalaisesta näkökulmasta. Keskityn patentti-, hyödyllisyysmalli-, tavaramerkki- ... -
IPR gender gaps : a first look at utility model, design right and trademark filings
Heikkilä, Jussi (Akademiai Kiado Rt., 2019)This study extends the analysis of the gender gap in patenting into design rights, utility model (UMs) and trademarks (TMs), which are complementary methods for protecting intellectual property. The analysis is descriptive ... -
Empirical analyses of European intellectual property rights institutions
Heikkilä, Jussi (University of Jyväskylä, 2018)This dissertation consists of introduction chapter and five empirical studies on European intellectual property rights institutions. Chapters 2, 3 and 4 are micro-level studies and the perspective shifts to macro-level ... -
The role of utility models in patent filing strategies : evidence from European countries
Heikkilä, Jussi; Verba, Michael (Springer, 2018)We examine the role of utility models (UM) in patent filing strategies. With an extensive patent family data from European countries, we explore the structures and characteristics of patent families, which include UMs. A ... -
Need for speed? : Exploring the relative importance of patents and utility models among German firms
Heikkilä, Jussi; Lorenz, Annika (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2018)Despite the wide use of two-tiered patent systems (patents and utility models (UMs)), there is little empirical evidence about how often UMs are actually used, what kind of firms use them to protect their intellectual ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.