Why aren't warning signals everywhere? : On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities
Kikuchi, D. W., Herberstein, M. E., Barfield, M., Holt, R. D., & Mappes, J. (2021). Why aren't warning signals everywhere? : On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities. Biological Reviews, 96(6), 2446-2460. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12760
Published inBiological Reviews
DisciplineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologiaCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary ResearchEcology and Evolutionary Biology
© 2021 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Warning signals are a striking example of natural selection present in almost every ecological community – from Nordic meadows to tropical rainforests, defended prey species and their mimics ward off potential predators before they attack. Yet despite the wide distribution of warning signals, they are relatively scarce as a proportion of the total prey available, and more so in some biomes than others. Classically, warning signals are thought to be governed by positive density-dependent selection, i.e. they succeed better when they are more common. Therefore, after surmounting this initial barrier to their evolution, it is puzzling that they remain uncommon on the scale of the community. Here, we explore factors likely to determine the prevalence of warning signals in prey assemblages. These factors include the nature of prey defences and any constraints upon them, the behavioural interactions of predators with different prey defences, the numerical responses of predators governed by movement and reproduction, the diversity and abundance of undefended alternative prey and Batesian mimics in the community, and variability in other ecological circumstances. We also discuss the macroevolution of warning signals. Our review finds that we have a basic understanding of how many species in some taxonomic groups have warning signals, but very little information on the interrelationships among population abundances across prey communities, the diversity of signal phenotypes, and prey defences. We also have detailed knowledge of how a few generalist predator species forage in artificial laboratory environments, but we know much less about how predators forage in complex natural communities with variable prey defences. We describe how empirical work to address each of these knowledge gaps can test specific hypotheses for why warning signals exhibit their particular patterns of distribution. This will help us to understand how behavioural interactions shape ecological communities. ...
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Additional information about fundingOpen access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Australian Research Council. Grant Number: DP190101028 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Grant Number: 316099922 University of Florida Foundation Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin WOA Institution: UNIVERSITAET BIELEFELD Blended DEAL: Projekt DEAL
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Evolution of signal diversity : predator-prey interactions and the maintenance of warning colour polymorphism in the wood tiger moth Arctia plantaginis Rönkä, Katja (University of Jyväskylä, 2017)Aposematic organisms avoid predation by advertising defences with warning signals. The theory of aposematism predicts warning signal uniformity, yet variation in warning coloration is widespread. The chemically defended ...
Kikuchi, David W.; Barfield, Michael; Herberstein, Marie E.; Mappes, Johanna; Holt, Robert D. (University of Chicago Press, 2022)Understanding Batesian mimicry is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. In Batesian mimicry, a defended species (the model) is mimicked by an undefended species (the mimic). Prior theories have emphasized the role of ...
Influence of colour, smell and taste on the survival of the wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis) adults during predation event Lommi, Jenna (2021)Saalistajien torjumiseksi saalis voi käyttää erilaisia puolustusmekanismeja, jotka stimuloivat useita eri aisteja (ts. multimodaalista signalointia). Esimerkiksi aposemaattiset eliöt puolustautuvat varoitussignaalin lisäksi ...
Winters, Anne E.; Lommi, Jenna; Kirvesoja, Jimi; Nokelainen, Ossi; Mappes, Johanna (Frontiers Media SA, 2021)Aposematic organisms warn predators of their unprofitability using a combination of defenses, including visual warning signals, startling sounds, noxious odors, or aversive tastes. Using multiple lines of defense can help ...
Burgas, Daniel; Ovaskainen, Otso; Blanchet, F. Guillaume; Byholm, Patrik (Frontiers Media SA, 2021)Despite the wide recognition that strongly interacting species can influence distributions of other species, species interactions are often disregarded when assessing or projecting biodiversity distributions. In particular, ...