Insect coloration as a defence mechanism against visually hunting predators
Insects utilise a wide variety of defence coloration including crypsis, aposematic coloration, and deflection patterns. The traditional view is that animals can maximise their cryptic coloration only on one background. I demonstrated experimentally that a compromised coloration could confer equal protection in two visually different habitats where its wearer survived altogether better than perfectly cryptic forms. Contrary to the cryptic coloration, conspicuousness is the essence of aposematic coloration and it is this character that provides the advantage of reduced predation risk through predator learning. Experiments on this intensively studied subject (and prey detection in general) have mostly ignored the fact that vision of birds, which are important predators on insects, is based on at least four colour receptors ranging from ultraviolet to red. I conducted a series of experiments to test whether UV cues alone can signal unpalatability. I did not find strong evidence that UV cues alone would function effectively as aposematic signals, but on the contrary they increased the predation risk. Our knowledge on aposematism and other defence mechanisms are largely based on experiments in butterflies. Pieridae butterflies have been regarded to exemplify the Müllerian mimicry concept. I did not, however, find support for the idea that their white coloration would signal unpalatability. Many Lepidoptera species do not rely on warning or cryptic coloration as their defence mechanism but they possess conspicuous eyespots on their wings. Eyespots are hypothesised to increase the likelihood of escape of the detected butterfly by deflecting attacks away from the body. I compared the rate of successful escapes between spotted and spotless butterflies under laboratory conditions using lizards and birds as predators. The two butterfly forms did not differ in their survival rate and thus predation hypothesis cannot solely explain the occurrence of spotting.
...
ISBN
978-951-39-8351-2ISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1456-9701Julkaisuun sisältyy osajulkaisuja
- Artikkeli I: Merilaita, S., Lyytinen, A., & Mappes, J. (2001). Selection for cryptic coloration in a visually heterogenous habitat. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1925-1929. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1747
- Artikkeli II: Lyytinen, A., Alatalo, R. V., Lindström, L., & Mappes, J. (2001). Can ultraviolet cues function as aposematic signals?. Behavioral Ecology, 1(12), 65-70. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.beheco.a000380
- Artikkeli III: Lyytinen, A., Lindström, L., & Mappes, J. (2004). Ultraviolet reflection and predation risk in diurnal and nocturnal Lepidoptera. Behavioral Ecology, 15(6), 982-987. DOI: 110.1093/beheco/arh102
- Artikkeli IV: Lyytinen, A., Alatalo, R. V., Lindstrom, L. & Mappes, J. (1999). Are European white butterflies aposematic? Evolutionary Ecology, 13, 709-719. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011081800202
- Artikkeli V: Lyytinen, A., Brakefield, P. M., & Mappes, J. (2003). Significance of butterfly eyespots as an anti-predator device in ground-based and aerial attacks. Oikos, 100(2), 373-379. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11935.x
Asiasanat
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Väitöskirjat [3580]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Testing the effectiveness of pyrazine defences against spiders
Burdfield-Steel, Emily R.; Schneider, Jutta M.; Mappes, Johanna; Dobler, Susanne (Springer, 2020)Insects live in a dangerous world and may fall prey to a wide variety of predators, encompassing multiple taxa. As a result, selection may favour defences that are effective against multiple predator types, or target-specific ... -
Multiple modalities in insect warning displays have additive effects against wild avian predators
Rojas Zuluaga, Bibiana; Mappes, Johanna; E., Burdfield-Steel (Springer, 2019)Allocation to different components of defence has been suggested as an explanation for the existence of multiple aposematic morphs in a single population. We tested whether there are trade-offs between warning colouration ... -
Antipredator strategies of pupae : how to avoid predation in an immobile life stage?
Lindstedt, Carita; Murphy, Liam; Mappes, Johanna (The Royal Society Publishing, 2019)Antipredator strategies of the pupal stage in insects have received little attention in comparison to larval or adult stages. This is despite the fact that predation risk can be high during the pupal stage, making it a ... -
Transparency reduces predator detection in mimetic clearwing butterflies
Arias, Mónica; Mappes, Johanna; Desbois, Charlotte; Gordon, Swanne; McClure, Melanie; Elias, Marianne; Nokelainen, Ossi; Gomez, Doris (Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2019)1. Predation is an important selective pressure, and some prey have evolved conspicuous warning signals that advertise unpalatability (i.e., aposematism) as an antipredator defence. Conspicuous colour patterns have been ... -
Can warning signals be honest? : wing colouration and the strength of chemical defence in the female wood tiger moth (Parasemia plataginis)
Brain, Morgan (2016)The warning displays of aposematic organisms signal to predators that they possess a secondary defence and are unprofitable. Within species variation exists in the strength of the signal and defence. As natural selection ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.