Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorHeinonen, Kirsi
dc.contributor.authorDe Grez, Nore
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Raija
dc.contributor.authorDe Wever, Bram
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meijs, Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T06:03:44Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T06:03:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHeinonen, K., De Grez, N., Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., & van der Meijs, S. (2020). Scripting as a pedagogical method to guide collaborative writing : university students’ reflections. <i>Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning</i>, <i>15</i>, Article 15. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00131-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00131-x</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_36274110
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71093
dc.description.abstractA collaboration script is a set of instructions used to improve collaborative learning among students in technology-enhanced environments. Previously, university students’ perspective has been under-represented in the study on collaboration scripts. In this article, we focus on understanding students’ experiences in a scripted collaborative writing task, especially from the perspective of following the script. The study was conducted among undergraduate students (N = 91) taking a master-level educational science course at one university each in Finland and Belgium. Divided into 25 groups, each with three to five members, the students worked on collaborative writing tasks. During their shared writing process within these groups, all students were introduced to a four-phase simultaneous sequential integrating construction script (SSCIS). Then, data from the students’ reflection notes on the collaborative writing process were analysed. The thematic analysis revealed that over half of the students highlighted how the introduced script provided them with appropriate support for the writing process; therefore, they used a script-based collaborative writing approach (52%). However, almost as many students (48%) viewed the script as inadequate or even impeding their accomplishment of the mutual writing task; therefore, they chose to deviate from it. In this group of students decided not to follow script-based writing engaged in the collective writing approach (32%), characterised as free form compared to sequential script-based writing. Other students opted for the separate writing approach (16%), leading them to divide the writing assignment into single parts among the group members and to compose the text without authentic collaboration. By focusing on students’ individual reflections, the findings of our study suggest that to enhance script-based learning processes, it is essential to provide guidance for the implementation of the script, additional content-related support or tailored choices.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.othercollaborative writing
dc.subject.othercomputer-supported collaborative learning
dc.subject.othertechnology-enhanced learning
dc.subject.otherhigher education
dc.titleScripting as a pedagogical method to guide collaborative writing : university students’ reflections
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202007075266
dc.contributor.laitosKasvatustieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Educationen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1793-2068
dc.relation.volume15
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Authors. 2020
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber292466
dc.subject.ysokorkeakoulupedagogiikka
dc.subject.ysotietokoneavusteinen oppiminen
dc.subject.ysoyhteistyö
dc.subject.ysokirjoittaminen
dc.subject.ysotieteellinen kirjoittaminen
dc.subject.ysoyhteisöllinen oppiminen
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14150
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7221
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6334
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2512
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6652
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p18727
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1186/s41039-020-00131-x
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
jyx.fundingprogramResearch profiles, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramProfilointi, SAfi
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by the Academy of Finland [grant numbers 292466 and 318095, the Multidisciplinary Research on Learning and Teaching profiles I and II of Universty of Jyväskylä (JYU)].
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0