Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey
Hämäläinen, L., Mappes, J., Rowland, H. M., Teichmann, M., & Thorogood, R. (2020). Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey. Journal of Animal Ecology, 89(5), 1153-1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13180
Julkaistu sarjassa
Journal of Animal EcologyTekijät
Päivämäärä
2020Oppiaine
Evoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologiaCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary ResearchEcology and Evolutionary BiologyTekijänoikeudet
© 2020 The Authors
1. To make adaptive foraging decisions, predators need to gather information about the profitability of prey. As well as learning from prey encounters, recent studies show that predators can learn about prey defences by observing the negative foraging experiences of conspecifics. However, predator communities are complex. While observing heterospecifics may increase learning opportunities, we know little about how social information use varies across predator species.
2. Social transmission of avoidance among predators also has potential consequences for defended prey. Conspicuous aposematic prey are assumed to be an easy target for naïve predators, but this cost may be reduced if multiple predators learn by observing single predation events. Heterospecific information use by predators might further benefit aposematic prey, but this remains untested.
3. Here we test conspecific and heterospecific information use across a predator community with wild‐caught blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major). We used video playback to manipulate social information about novel aposematic prey and then compared birds’ foraging choices in ‘a small‐scale novel world’ that contained novel palatable and aposematic prey items.
4. We expected that blue tits would be less likely to use social information compared to great tits. However, we found that both blue tits and great tits consumed fewer aposematic prey after observing a negative foraging experience of a demonstrator. In fact, this effect was stronger in blue tits compared to great tits. Interestingly, blue tits also learned more efficiently from watching conspecifics, whereas great tits learned similarly regardless of the demonstrator species.
5. Together, our results indicate that social transmission about novel aposematic prey occurs in multiple predator species and across species boundaries. This supports the idea that social interactions among predators can reduce attacks on aposematic prey and therefore influence selection for prey defences.
...
Julkaisija
Wiley-BlackwellISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
0021-8790Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/34173957
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Rahoittaja(t)
Suomen AkatemiaRahoitusohjelmat(t)
Huippuyksikkörahoitus, SA; Akatemiaprofessorin tutkimuskulut, SALisätietoja rahoituksesta
Finnish Cultural Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Academy of Finland, Grant/ Award Number: #284666 and #320438; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London; Max Planck Society; Natural Environment Research Council, Grant/ Award Number: NE/K00929X/1; Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki.Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Social information use about novel aposematic prey is not influenced by a predator's previous experience with toxins
Hämäläinen, Liisa; Mappes, Johanna; Rowland, Hannah M.; Thorogood, Rose (Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2019)Aposematism is an effective antipredator strategy. However, the initial evolution and maintenance of aposematism are paradoxical because conspicuous prey are vulnerable to attack by naïve predators. Consequently, the ... -
Social information use by predators : expanding the information ecology of prey defences
Hämäläinen, Liisa; M. Rowland, Hannah; Mappes, Johanna; Thorogood, Rose (Wiley-Blackwell, 2022)Social information use is well documented across the animal kingdom, but how it influences ecological and evolutionary processes is only just beginning to be investigated. Here we evaluate how social transmission may ... -
The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited : integrating prior social and personal experience
Hämäläinen, Liisa; Thorogood, Rose (The Royal Society Publishing, 2020)Ever since Alfred R. Wallace suggested brightly coloured, toxic insects warn predators about their unprofitability, evolutionary biologists have searched for an explanation of how these aposematic prey evolve and are ... -
Geographic mosaic of selection by avian predators on hindwing warning colour in a polymorphic aposematic moth
Rönkä, Katja; Valkonen, Janne K.; Nokelainen, Ossi; Rojas, Bibiana; Gordon, Swanne; Burdfield‐Steel, Emily; Mappes, Johanna (Wiley-Blackwell, 2020)Warning signals are predicted to develop signal monomorphism via positive frequency‐dependent selection (+FDS) albeit many aposematic systems exhibit signal polymorphism. To understand this mismatch, we conducted a large‐scale ... -
Colour alone matters : no predator generalization among morphs of an aposematic moth
Rönkä, Katja; De Pasqual, Chiara; Mappes, Johanna; Gordon, Swanne; Rojas Zuluaga, Bibiana (Elsevier Ltd., 2018)Local warning colour polymorphism, frequently observed in aposematic organisms, is evolutionarily puzzling. This is because variation in aposematic signals is expected to be selected against due to predators' difficulties ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.