Students' evaluation of information during online inquiry : Working individually or in pairs
Kiili, Carita; Coiro, Julie; Räikkönen, Eija (2019). Students' evaluation of information during online inquiry : Working individually or in pairs. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 42 (3), 167-183.
Published inAustralian Journal of Language and Literacy
© The Author & ALEA, 2019
Varying information quality and an increase of misinformation on the Internet accentuates the importance of supporting students’ competencies to critically evaluate information. This study compared how individuals and pairs of secondary students worked to evaluate the quality of online information across two inquiry topics. Two similar studies were conducted with 140 Finnish (Study I) and 52 US (Study II) students. Students were asked to conduct an online inquiry and then write an essay about one of two topics: allowing the genetic modification of organisms (GMO) or the effects of social media on people’s quality of life (SM). Students worked either individually or in pairs. Their work was supported with a digital tool that prompted them to evaluate the credibility of online texts they selected as sources for their essays. Three separate analyses of covariance were conducted to examine differences in evaluation of online texts between individual and paired readers as well as between the inquiry topics across three dimensions: 1) total number of relevant justifications for credibility evaluations, 2) different types of relevant justifications, and 3) overall quality of students’ evaluations and justifications across all responses captured by the digital tool. Results showed that working in pairs appeared to support the evaluation of online information in all assessed aspects in one context (Study I) but not in another (Study II). In Study 1, the GMO topic appeared to stimulate students’ evaluation of information slightly more than SM, while there was no difference in evaluation performance across topics in Study 2. Findings suggest that discussing the credibility of online texts with a partner is a promising practice. Future research should explore more qualitative dimensions of how partners work together as they evaluate online texts and how instruction could be used to support collaborative evaluation. ...
PublisherAustralian Literacy Educators' Association
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Additional information about fundingThe research reported in this article was supported by the Elva Knight award 2014 from International Literacy Association to Julie Coiro and Carita Kiili. The authors want to thank Janna Inkeroinen, for helping in the data analyses.
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Kiili, Carita; Laurinen, Leena; Marttunen, Miika (Baywood Publishing Company, 2008)The Internet is a significant information resource for students due to the ease of access it allows to a vast amount of information. As the quality of the information on the Internet varies, it is important that students ...
Students' abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts : The role of internet‐specific epistemic justifications Hämäläinen, Elina K.; Kiili, Carita; Räikkönen, Eija; Marttunen, Miika (Wiley, 2021)Previous evaluation studies have rarely used authentic online texts and investigated upper secondary school students' use of evaluation criteria and deep reasoning. The associations between internet-specific epistemic ...
Hämäläinen, Elina (Finra ry, 2020)Internetin tarjoama suuri määrä laadultaan vaihtelevaa informaatiota on tehnyt tiedon luotettavuuden arvioinnista entistä vaikeampaa. Tiedon alkuperä, laatu ja todenmukaisuus ovat usein epäselviä, mikä vaikeuttaa asiallisen ...
Kiili, Carita; Bråten, Ivar; Strømsø, Helge I.; Hagerman, Michelle Schira; Räikkönen, Eija; Jyrkiäinen, Anne (Springer, 2022)Research has shown that students differ in their abilities to evaluate the credibility of online texts, and, in general, many perform poorly on online evaluation tasks. This study extended current knowledge by examining ...
Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health Kiili, Carita; Leu, Donald J.; Marttunen, Miika; Hautala, Jarkko; Leppänen, Paavo H.T. (Springer Netherlands, 2018)This study assessed the ability of 426 students (ages 12–13) to critically evaluate two types of online locations on health issues: an academic resource and a commercial resource. The results indicated limited evaluation ...