Construct validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Multanen, J., Honkanen, M., Häkkinen, A., & Kiviranta, I. (2018). Construct validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19, Article 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2078-7
Julkaistu sarjassa
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersPäivämäärä
2018Tekijänoikeudet
© The Authors. 2018
Background: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a commonly used knee assessment and
outcome tool in both clinical work and research. However, it has not been formally translated and validated in
Finnish. The purpose of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the KOOS questionnaire into Finnish and to
determine its validity and reliability among Finnish middle-aged patients with knee injuries.
Methods: KOOS was translated and culturally adapted from English into Finnish. Subsequently, 59 patients with
knee injuries completed the Finnish version of KOOS, Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC),
Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (Pain-NRS). The same KOOS questionnaire was
re-administered 2 weeks later. Psychometric assessment of the Finnish KOOS was performed by testing its construct
validity and reliability by using internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error. The floor and
ceiling effects were also examined.
Results: The cross-cultural adaptation revealed only minor cultural differences and was well received by the
patients. For construct validity, high to moderate Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients were found between the
KOOS subscales and the WOMAC, SF-36, and Pain-NRS subscales. The Cronbach’s alpha was from 0.79 to 0.96
for all subscales indicating acceptable internal consistency. The test-retest reliability was good to excellent, with Intraclass
Correlation Coefficients ranging from 0.73 to 0.86 for all KOOS subscales. The minimal detectable change ranged from 17
to 34 on an individual level and from 2 to 4 on a group level. No floor or ceiling effects were observed.
Conclusion: This study yielded an appropriately translated and culturally adapted Finnish version of KOOS
which demonstrated good validity and reliability. Our data indicate that the Finnish version of KOOS is
suitable for assessment of the knee status of Finnish patients with different knee complaints. Further studies are
needed to evaluate the predictive ability of KOOS in the Finnish population.
...
Julkaisija
BioMed CentralISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1471-2474Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/28081638
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Liikuntatieteiden tiedekunta [3164]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Reliability and Validity Study of the Finnish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version SRS-30
Kyrölä, Kati; Järvenpää, Salme; Ylinen, Jari; Mecklin, Jukka-Pekka; Repo, Jussi Petteri; Häkkinen, Arja (Lippincott Co., 2017)Study Design. A prospective clinical study to test and adapt a Finnish version of the Scoliosis Research Society 30 (SRS-30) questionnaire. Objective. To perform cross-cultural adaptation and evaluate the validity of the ... -
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA)
Repo, Jussi P.; Tukiainen, Erkki J.; Roine, Risto P.; Kautiainen, Hannu; Lindahl, Jan; Ilves, Outi; Järvenpää, Salme; Häkkinen, Arja (Elsevier Ltd, 2018)Background There have previously been no validated foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures in Finnish. Methods The Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) was translated and adapted into Finnish. ... -
Dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the Finnish version of the pain catastrophizing scale in chronic low back pain
Mikkonen, Jani; Leinonen, Ville; Lähdeoja, Tuomas; Holopainen, Riikka; Ekström, Kristian; Koho, Petteri; Airaksinen, Olavi; Luciano, Juan V.; Navarrete, Jaime; Neblett, Randy (De Gruyter, 2024)Objectives The 13-item pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is the most commonly used measure of pain catastrophizing. A validated Finnish version of the PCS has previously been unavailable. The objectives were to translate ... -
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers
Asunta, Piritta; Viholainen, Helena; Ahonen, Timo; Cantell, M.; Westerholm, J.; Schoemaker, M.M.; Rintala, Pauli (Elsevier B.V., 2017)Objectives Observational screening instruments are often used as an effective, economical first step in the identification of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The aim was to investigate the ... -
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section
Piitulainen, Kirsi; Paloneva, Juha; Ylinen, Jari; Kautiainen, Hannu; Häkkinen, Arja (BioMed Central Ltd., 2014)Abstract. Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) is one of the most widely used shoulder outcome tools in clinical work and in scientific studies. However, it ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.