Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers
Asunta, P., Viholainen, H., Ahonen, T., Cantell, M., Westerholm, J., Schoemaker, M.M., & Rintala, P. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers. Human Movement Science, 53, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.12.006
Julkaistu sarjassa
Human Movement ScienceTekijät
Päivämäärä
2017Oppiaine
ErityispedagogiikkaPsykologiaErityisliikuntaSpecial EducationPsychologyAdapted Physical ActivityTekijänoikeudet
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Elsevier. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
Objectives
Observational screening instruments are often used as an effective, economical first step in the identification of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T-FI).
Methods
The psychometric properties were tested using two separate samples (S1: age range 6–12, M 9y 5mo, females 101, males 92; S2: age range 6–9, M 7y 7mo, females 404, males 446). Teachers completed the MOQ-T-FI in both samples, and in sample 2 teachers’ ratings were compared to student’s performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). Internal consistency was investigated by using Cronbach’s alpha, predictive validity by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, concurrent validity by correlation analysis, and construct validity by factor analysis.
Results
The MOQ-T-FI behaves consistently with its original Dutch version. The internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.97). The bifactor model, with one general factor and two specific factors, fit the data significantly better than the first-order model. The concurrent validity with the MABC-2 was moderate (r = 0.37 p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 82.5% and specificity 44.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
Notwithstanding the low specificity the MOQ-T-FI can be considered as a promising screening tool in the school environment for Finnish children at risk of motor learning problems.
...
Julkaisija
Elsevier B.V.ISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
0167-9457Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/26564984
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties : a systematic review
Asunta, P.; Viholainen, H.; Ahonen, T.; Rintala, P. (BioMed Central Ltd., 2019)Background Early identification of children with motor difficulties, such as developmental coordination disorder (DCD), is essential. At present only a fraction of children with DCD are identified. The purpose of the study ... -
Validity of the Finnish version of the Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA)
Aunola, Kaisa; Sorkkila, Matilda; Tolvanen, Asko (Wiley-Blackwell, 2020)The aim of the present study was to validate the Finnish version of the Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA) using data from 1,688 Finnish parents (91\% mothers) living in Finland with at least one child living at home. ... -
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA)
Repo, Jussi P.; Tukiainen, Erkki J.; Roine, Risto P.; Kautiainen, Hannu; Lindahl, Jan; Ilves, Outi; Järvenpää, Salme; Häkkinen, Arja (Elsevier Ltd, 2018)Background There have previously been no validated foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures in Finnish. Methods The Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) was translated and adapted into Finnish. ... -
Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section
Piitulainen, Kirsi; Paloneva, Juha; Ylinen, Jari; Kautiainen, Hannu; Häkkinen, Arja (BioMed Central Ltd., 2014)Abstract. Background: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) is one of the most widely used shoulder outcome tools in clinical work and in scientific studies. However, it ... -
Construct validity and reliability of the Finnish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Multanen, Juhani; Honkanen, Mikko; Häkkinen, Arja; Kiviranta, Ilkka (BioMed Central, 2018)Background: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a commonly used knee assessment and outcome tool in both clinical work and research. However, it has not been formally translated and validated ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.