Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSelonen, Ville
dc.contributor.authorMussaari, Maija
dc.contributor.authorToivanen, Tero
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, Janne Sakari
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-13T09:29:20Z
dc.date.available2016-01-13T09:29:20Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationSelonen, V., Mussaari, M., Toivanen, T., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2011). The conservation potential of brook-side key habitats in managed boreal forests. <i>Silva Fennica</i>, <i>45</i>(5), 1041-1052. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.85" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.85</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_21337072
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/48346
dc.description.abstractToday, maintaining biodiversity is included in the targets of boreal forest management. A widespread approach in northern Europe is to identify and preserve woodland key habitats within managed forests. Woodland key habitats are expected to be patches that host populations of threatened and declining species, and the preservation of these patches is assumed to enable the persistence of the focal species in the landscape. In Finland, the criteria for selecting woodland key habitats are defined in the Finnish Forest Act, and the selection has been done by forest practitioners. Our objective was to determine whether the surroundings of boreal brooks and rivulets qualified as key habitats are truly different from brook-side habitats not granted the key habitat status, and whether the brook-side habitats of the two types differ from the forest matrix managed for timber production. We found that the two brook-side habitats were in most aspects rather alike but there was a difference in the composition of ground vegetation assemblages. In contrast, the control forests were distinct from the brook-sides in terms of dead wood, species richness and assemblages of polypores, species richness of epiphytic mosses, and the composition of beetle assemblages. We conclude that brook-sides in general provide an important habitat clearly diverging from the surrounding matrix but that the conservation value of the brook-sides granted the key habitat status may not be substantially larger than that of the brook-sides without the status.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFinnish Society of Forest Science, Finnish Forest Research Institute
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSilva Fennica
dc.relation.urihttp://www.metla.fi/silvafennica/full/sf45/sf4551041.pdf
dc.subject.otherlahopuu
dc.subject.othersaproksyylilaji
dc.subject.otherdead wood
dc.subject.othersaproxylic species
dc.titleThe conservation potential of brook-side key habitats in managed boreal forests
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201601111074
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)fi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Researchen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2016-01-11T16:15:04Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1041-1052
dc.relation.issn0037-5330
dc.relation.numberinseries5
dc.relation.volume45
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© the Authors. Published by Finnish Society of Forest Science, Finnish Forest Research Institute.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysometsätalous
dc.subject.ysokasvillisuus
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1861
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1756
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
dc.relation.doi10.14214/sf.85
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record