Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorStosic, Jelena
dc.contributor.authorFinni Juutinen, Taija
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-14T11:10:10Z
dc.date.available2011-12-14T11:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationStosic, J., & Finni Juutinen, T. (2011). Gastrocnemius tendon length and strain are different when assessed using straight or curved tendon model. <i>European Journal of Applied Physiology</i>, <i>111</i>(12), 3151-4. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1929-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1929-9</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_20308204
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/37085
dc.description.abstractThe present study investigated the effects of tendon curvature on measurements of tendon length using 3D-kinematic analysis. Curved and straight tendon models were employed for assessing medial gastrocnemius tendon length and strain during hopping (N = 8). Tendon curvature was identified using small reflective markers placed on the skin surface along the length of the tendon and a sum of vectors between the markers from the calcaneous up to the marker at the origin of tendon was calculated. The straight tendon was defined as a length of vector from the calcaneous to the marker at the origin of tendon. The curved tendon method yielded 5.0 ± 1.3 mm longer tendon (p < 0.001) than the straight tendon model. Tendon elongation was 2.1 ± 1.6 mm and peak strain 1.3 ± 0.7% smaller in curved than in straight tendon model (p < 0.01). The results suggest that the commonly used straight tendon model underestimate slightly but significantly the true tendon length but overestimate the strain and elongation.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Link
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
dc.subject.otherakillesjänne
dc.subject.otherjänne
dc.subject.othervenymä
dc.subject.otherhyppely
dc.subject.otherAchilles tendon
dc.subject.othertendon length
dc.subject.othertendon strain
dc.subject.otherhopping
dc.titleGastrocnemius tendon length and strain are different when assessed using straight or curved tendon model
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-2011121311791
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntabiologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biology of Physical Activityen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomekaniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomechanicsen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2011-12-13T04:30:11Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange3151-4
dc.relation.issn1439-6319
dc.relation.numberinseries12
dc.relation.volume111
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Springer-Verlag 2011. This is an electronic final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in European Journal of Applied Physiology by Springer.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysoultraäänitutkimus
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19405
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s00421-011-1929-9
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot