Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorPaloviita, Ari
dc.contributor.authorLuoma-aho, Vilma
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-21T07:14:16Z
dc.date.available2011-01-21T07:14:16Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationPaloviita, A., & Luoma-aho, V. (2010). Recognizing definitive stakeholders in corporate environmental management. <em>Management Research Review</em>, 33 (4). <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01409171011030435">doi:10.1108/01409171011030435</a>
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_36990
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/25813
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to present four examples of stakeholder relationships related to issues of corporate environmental management (CEM) and analyze them based on the model of Mitchell et al. (1997). Design/methodology/approach – Secondary data are used in the case studies. Findings – The four cases presented show that basically any stakeholder can become definitive over time in the complex network of stakeholders with mutual relationships. The definitive stakeholders in CEM are no longer merely the NGOs and policymakers but now include many diverse groups such as customers, locals and suppliers. Research limitations/implications – These case studies cannot be generalized, but they could contribute to more comprehensive studies on stakeholder strategies in the future by raising up new CEM issues. Practical implications – The paper indicates that stakeholder strategies need to be changed in corporations over time. Latent stakeholders can become expectant and definitive stakeholders gradually over time. Originality/value – The paper presents and analyzes four different cases of corporation-stakeholder relations in the field of corporate environmental management
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.relation.ispartofseriesManagement Research Review
dc.subject.otherstakeholder typology, corporate environmental management, definitive stakeholders
dc.titleRecognizing definitive stakeholders in corporate environmental management
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-20112211792
dc.contributor.laitosTaloustieteiden tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosViestintätieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineYritysten ympäristöjohtaminenfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineYhteisöviestintäfi
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/01409171011030435
dc.date.updated2011-01-21T07:01:36Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2040-8269
dc.relation.numberinseries4
dc.relation.volume33
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Emerald. This is an electronic final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published in Management Research Review by Emerald.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot