Why Open Educational Resources Repositories fail - Review of Quality Assurance Approaches
Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2014). Why Open Educational Resources Repositories fail - Review of Quality Assurance Approaches. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN14 Proceedings. 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 929-939). IATED Academy. EDULEARN proceedings. http://library.iated.org/view/CLEMENTS2014WHY
Julkaistu sarjassa
EDULEARN proceedingsPäivämäärä
2014Oppiaine
Digitaalinen mediaTekijänoikeudet
© the Authors & IATED, 2014.
Regardless of the amount of open educational resources (OER) available, many learning object
repositories LORs fail to attract active users and sustainable funding solutions. Previous studies
indicate that quality of OER plays a significant role in the success of the repositories; however, there is
a lack of systematic deeper understanding of this connection. In this qualitative study we interviewed
35 managers/developers of 27 national, thematic and federated LORs in regards of the LORs’ quality
approaches and success. The key findings of this study show that comprehensive quality approach
leads to success of the repository in most cases, the key instruments for quality assurance being
expert and peer reviews. Contribution of this research is the review of LOR quality approaches. This
study helps LOR developers to design sustainable quality assurance approaches.
Julkaisija
IATED AcademyEmojulkaisun ISBN
978-84-617-0557-3Konferenssi
International Conference on Education and New Learning TechnologiesKuuluu julkaisuun
EDULEARN14 Proceedings. 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning TechnologiesISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2340-1117
Alkuperäislähde
http://library.iated.org/view/CLEMENTS2014WHYJulkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/23754012
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Why open educational resources repositories fail : the contribution of quality approaches to the success of repositories
Clements, Kati (University of Jyväskylä, 2016)Over the last two decades, millions of Open Educational Resources (OER) have become freely available for teachers and learners online. These resources are usually accessible through Learning Object Repositories (LORs), ... -
Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework
Clements, Kati; Pawlowski, Jan; Manouselis, Nikos (Pergamon, 2015)Today, Open Educational Resources (OER) are commonly stored, used, adapted, remixed and shared within Learning object repositories (LORs) which have recently started expanding their design to support collaborative teaching ... -
Explaining barriers to the usage of learning object repositories : comparison between Europe and Latin America
Liao, Laidis Loriel (2020)Learning Object Repositories have a great potential to enhance knowledge sharing in the teaching community. However, the usage of Learning Object Repositories has not met the expectations that the supporting institutions ... -
Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations
Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée (University of Jyväskylä, 2017)The use of Open Educational Resources (OERs) is promising as a complementary resource to traditional e-learning courses. Digital learning resources can be accessed on demand and can be developed by a wide range of ... -
Overcoming Cultural Distance in Social OER Environments
Pirkkalainen, Henri; Jokinen, Jussi; Pawlowski, Jan M.; Richter, Thomas (Insticc press, 2014)Open educational resources (OERs) provide opportunities as enablers of societal development, but they also create new challenges. From the perspective of content providers and educational institutions, particularly, cultural ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.