Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaksa, Tytti
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-08T13:46:09Z
dc.date.available2024-11-08T13:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationSaksa, T. (2025). Comparison of finite element and discrete exterior calculus in computation of time-harmonic wave propagation with controllability. <i>Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics</i>, <i>457</i>, Article 116154. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.116154" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2024.116154</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_233462987
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/98230
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses computation of time-harmonic wave problems using a mixed formulation and the controllability method introduced by Roland Glowinski. As an example, a scattering problem (in an exterior domain) is considered, and the continuous problem is first formulated in terms of differential forms. Based on the continuous formulation, we write the discrete problem and the controllability algorithm for methods based on both the finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) and the discrete exterior calculus (DEC). As the discrete exterior calculus method provides us with a diagonal ”mass matrix”, time-stepping in the DEC approach is remarkably more efficient than in the FEEC approach. For the computations in this paper, we choose the lowest order Whitney elements (a.k.a. Raviart–Thomas elements) for the FEEC approach, and in the DEC discretization we use different diagonal approximations for the Hodge star. Especially, in the DEC approach, a ”harmonic Hodge” approximation is used, the derivation of which is based on the time-harmonicity of the problem. Different type of grids are used to study the sensitivity of the solution to the quality of the grid. Putting an effort on meshes regular enough, the computed DEC-solution is as accurate as the FEEC-solution, but reached in the fraction of the time. Both methods seem to be able to keep the solution accuracy rather well in computations with a high wave number (corresponding to a high frequency and a small wave length).en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherwave equation
dc.subject.othertime-harmonic waves
dc.subject.otheracoustics
dc.subject.otherdiscrete exterior calculus
dc.subject.otherdiscrete differential forms
dc.subject.otherfinite element exterior calculus
dc.subject.otherfinite element method
dc.subject.otherhigh wavenumber
dc.titleComparison of finite element and discrete exterior calculus in computation of time-harmonic wave propagation with controllability
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202411087078
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0377-0427
dc.relation.volume457
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2025 Elsevier
dc.rights.accesslevelembargoedAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoaaltoyhtälöt
dc.subject.ysoelementtimenetelmä
dc.subject.ysoakustiikka
dc.subject.ysodiskreetti matematiikka
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p39811
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24565
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2909
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27156
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.cam.2024.116154
jyx.fundinginformationThe author has been supported by the Academy of Finland Grant #260076 and by the Czech Academy of Sciences through RVO: 67985840.
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0