dc.contributor.author | Korhonen, Pekka | |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, Francis K. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Niku, Jenni | |
dc.contributor.author | Taskinen, Sara | |
dc.contributor.author | van der Veen, Bert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-29T10:37:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-29T10:37:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Korhonen, P., Hui, F. K. C., Niku, J., Taskinen, S., & van der Veen, B. (2024). A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data. <i>Methods in Ecology and Evolution</i>, <i>Early online</i>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_243663495 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/97815 | |
dc.description.abstract | Joint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species- and the community-level. The family of generalised linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence-absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero-inflated counts. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover response variables, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, that is, have 0% or 100% cover, respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence-absence data and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Methods in Ecology and Evolution | |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
dc.subject.other | beta regression | |
dc.subject.other | community-level modelling | |
dc.subject.other | latent variable model | |
dc.subject.other | ordination | |
dc.subject.other | percent coverdata | |
dc.subject.other | zero-inflation | |
dc.title | A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296668 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Liikuntatieteellinen tiedekunta | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Matematiikan ja tilastotieteen laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences | en |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Mathematics and Statistics | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.relation.issn | 2041-210X | |
dc.relation.volume | Early online | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © 2024 The Author(s). Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | mallintaminen | |
dc.subject.yso | eliöyhteisöt | |
dc.subject.yso | ekosysteemit (ekologia) | |
dc.subject.yso | populaatioekologia | |
dc.subject.yso | levinneisyys | |
dc.subject.yso | tilastotiede | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3533 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4636 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4997 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20115 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7415 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3591 | |
dc.rights.url | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1111/2041-210x.14437 | |
jyx.fundinginformation | PK was funded by the Wihuri Foundation (00220161), and PK, JN and ST were funded by the Kone Foundation (201903741). ST was funded by the Research Council of Finland (453691) and the HiTEc COST Action (CA21163). FKCH was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP230101908). | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |