Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKorhonen, Pekka
dc.contributor.authorHui, Francis K. C.
dc.contributor.authorNiku, Jenni
dc.contributor.authorTaskinen, Sara
dc.contributor.authorvan der Veen, Bert
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T10:37:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-29T10:37:42Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationKorhonen, P., Hui, F. K. C., Niku, J., Taskinen, S., & van der Veen, B. (2024). A comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data. <i>Methods in Ecology and Evolution</i>, <i>Early online</i>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14437</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_243663495
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/97815
dc.description.abstractJoint species distribution models (JSDMs) have gained considerable traction among ecologists over the past decade, due to their capacity to answer a wide range of questions at both the species- and the community-level. The family of generalised linear latent variable models in particular has proven popular for building JSDMs, being able to handle many response types including presence-absence data, biomass, overdispersed and/or zero-inflated counts. We extend latent variable models to handle percent cover response variables, with vegetation, sessile invertebrate and macroalgal cover data representing the prime examples of such data arising in community ecology. Sparsity is a commonly encountered challenge with percent cover data. Responses are typically recorded as percentages covered per plot, though some species may be completely absent or present, that is, have 0% or 100% cover, respectively, rendering the use of beta distribution inadequate. We propose two JSDMs suitable for percent cover data, namely a hurdle beta model and an ordered beta model. We compare the two proposed approaches to a beta distribution for shifted responses, transformed presence-absence data and an ordinal model for percent cover classes. Results demonstrate the hurdle beta JSDM was generally the most accurate at retrieving the latent variables and predicting ecological percent cover data.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMethods in Ecology and Evolution
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherbeta regression
dc.subject.othercommunity-level modelling
dc.subject.otherlatent variable model
dc.subject.otherordination
dc.subject.otherpercent coverdata
dc.subject.otherzero-inflation
dc.titleA comparison of joint species distribution models for percent cover data
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202410296668
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosMatematiikan ja tilastotieteen laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Mathematics and Statisticsen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2041-210X
dc.relation.volumeEarly online
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2024 The Author(s). Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysomallintaminen
dc.subject.ysoeliöyhteisöt
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemit (ekologia)
dc.subject.ysopopulaatioekologia
dc.subject.ysolevinneisyys
dc.subject.ysotilastotiede
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3533
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4636
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4997
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20115
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7415
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3591
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1111/2041-210x.14437
jyx.fundinginformationPK was funded by the Wihuri Foundation (00220161), and PK, JN and ST were funded by the Kone Foundation (201903741). ST was funded by the Research Council of Finland (453691) and the HiTEc COST Action (CA21163). FKCH was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project (DP230101908).
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0