Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLang, Justin J.
dc.contributor.authorPrince, Stephanie A.
dc.contributor.authorMerucci, Katherine.
dc.contributor.authorCadenas-Sanchez, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorChaput, Jean-Philippe
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Brooklyn J.
dc.contributor.authorManyanga, Taru
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Francisco B
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Ben
dc.contributor.authorTomkinson, Grant R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T09:37:20Z
dc.date.available2024-04-30T09:37:20Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationLang, J. J., Prince, S. A., Merucci, Katherine., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Chaput, J.-P., Fraser, B. J., Manyanga, T., McGrath, R., Ortega, F. B., Singh, B., & Tomkinson, G. R. (2024). Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and consistent predictor of morbidity and mortality among adults : an overview of meta-analyses representing over 20.9 million observations from 199 unique cohort studies. <i>British Journal of Sports Medicine</i>, <i>Online First</i>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-107849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-107849</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_213403422
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/94593
dc.description.abstractObjective To examine and summarise evidence from meta-analyses of cohort studies that evaluated the predictive associations between baseline cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health outcomes among adults. Design Overview of systematic reviews. Data source Five bibliographic databases were searched from January 2002 to March 2024. Results From the 9062 papers identified, we included 26 systematic reviews. We found eight meta-analyses that described five unique mortality outcomes among general populations. CRF had the largest risk reduction for all-cause mortality when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.56). A dose–response relationship for every 1-metabolic equivalent of task (MET) higher level of CRF was associated with a 11%–17% reduction in all-cause mortality (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.92, and HR=0.83; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88). For incident outcomes, nine meta-analyses described 12 unique outcomes. CRF was associated with the largest risk reduction in incident heart failure when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.31; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.49). A dose–response relationship for every 1-MET higher level of CRF was associated with a 18% reduction in heart failure (HR=0.82; 95% CI 0.79 to 0.84). Among those living with chronic conditions, nine meta-analyses described four unique outcomes in nine patient groups. CRF was associated with the largest risk reduction for cardiovascular mortality among those living with cardiovascular disease when comparing high versus low CRF (HR=0.27; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.48). The certainty of the evidence across all studies ranged from very low-to-moderate according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Conclusion We found consistent evidence that high CRF is strongly associated with lower risk for a variety of mortality and incident chronic conditions in general and clinical populations.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0
dc.titleCardiorespiratory fitness is a strong and consistent predictor of morbidity and mortality among adults : an overview of meta-analyses representing over 20.9 million observations from 199 unique cohort studies
dc.typereview article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202404303220
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0306-3674
dc.relation.volumeOnline First
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysometa-analyysi
dc.subject.ysokuolleisuus
dc.subject.ysofyysinen kunto
dc.subject.ysosystemaattiset kirjallisuuskatsaukset
dc.subject.ysokrooniset taudit
dc.subject.ysokohorttitutkimus
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27697
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5003
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7384
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p29683
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22702
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25606
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1136/bjsports-2023-107849
jyx.fundinginformationThe authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Ortega is supported by the Grant PID2020-120249RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the Andalusian Government (Junta de Andalucía, Plan Andaluz de Investigación, ref. P20_00124). Dr. Cadenas-Sanchez is supported by a grant from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant agreement No 101028929. Dr. Fraser is supported by a National Heart Foundation of Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship (106588).
dc.type.okmA2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC 4.0