Replies to Vendrell Ferran, Piercey, Schechtman, and Collins
Mikkonen, J. (2024). Replies to Vendrell Ferran, Piercey, Schechtman, and Collins. Philosophia, Early online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00713-9
Published in
PhilosophiaDate
2024Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024
i) Íngrid Vendrell Ferran’s defence of the ‘experiential view’ and her related conception of ‘radical neo-cogntivism’, ii) Robert Piercey’s view of the epistemic value of plots and emplotment, iii) Marya Schechtman’s revisionist ideas of self-narration, and, fnally, iv) David Collins’s suggestion of the value of an imaginative engagement with the author of an artwork.
Publisher
SpringerISSN Search the Publication Forum
0048-3893Keywords
Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/202022473
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Additional information about funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU). The research leading to these results (Philosophy, Literature and Understanding) received funding from the Academy of Finland (Judgment and Human Rationality project, led by Leila Haaparanta; and Instrumental Narratives: The Limits of Storytelling and New Story-Critical Narrative Theory (no. 314768), led by Maria Mäkelä), the Finnish ...
License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0