Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEkman, Ellinoora
dc.contributor.authorTriviño, María
dc.contributor.authorBlattert, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorMazziotta, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorPotterf, Maria
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T07:31:54Z
dc.date.available2024-01-19T07:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationEkman, E., Triviño, M., Blattert, C., Mazziotta, A., Potterf, M., & Eyvindson, K. (2024). Disentangling the effects of management and climate change on habitat suitability for saproxylic species in boreal forests. <i>Journal of Forestry Research</i>, <i>35</i>, Article 34. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01678-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01678-3</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_197934202
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/92898
dc.description.abstractForest degradation induced by intensive forest management and temperature increase by climate change are resulting in biodiversity decline in boreal forests. Intensive forest management and high-end climate emission scenarios can further reduce the amount and diversity of deadwood, the limiting factor for habitats for saproxylic species in European boreal forests. The magnitude of their combined effects and how changes in forest management can affect deadwood diversity under a range of climate change scenarios are poorly understood. We used forest growth simulations to evaluate how forest management and climate change will individually and jointly affect habitats of red-listed saproxylic species in Finland. We simulated seven forest management regimes and three climate scenarios (reference, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) over 100 years. Management regimes included set aside, continuous cover forestry, business-as-usual (BAU) and four modifications of BAU. Habitat suitability was assessed using a species-specific habitat suitability index, including 21 fungal and invertebrate species groups. “Winner” and “loser” species were identified based on the modelled impacts of forest management and climate change on their habitat suitability. We found that forest management had a major impact on habitat suitability of saproxylic species compared to climate change. Habitat suitability index varied by over 250% among management regimes, while overall change in habitat suitability index caused by climate change was on average only 2%. More species groups were identified as winners than losers from impacts of climate change (52%–95% were winners, depending on the climate change scenario and management regime). The largest increase in habitat suitability index was achieved under set aside (254%) and the climate scenario RCP8.5 (> 2%), while continuous cover forestry was the most suitable regime to increase habitat suitability of saproxylic species (up to + 11%) across all climate change scenarios. Our results show that close-to-nature management regimes (e.g., continuous cover forestry and set aside) can increase the habitat suitability of many saproxylic boreal species more than the basic business-as-usual regime. This suggests that biodiversity loss of many saproxylic species in boreal forests can be mitigated through improved forest management practices, even as climate change progresses.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Forestry Research
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.othersimulations
dc.subject.otherFinland
dc.subject.otherforest planning
dc.subject.otherhabitat suitability
dc.subject.otherdeadwood
dc.titleDisentangling the effects of management and climate change on habitat suitability for saproxylic species in boreal forests
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202401191394
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1007-662X
dc.relation.volume35
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2024
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber326321
dc.relation.grantnumber202206136
dc.subject.ysometsäsuunnittelu
dc.subject.ysohabitaatti
dc.subject.ysosimulointi
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1863
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5678
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4787
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s11676-023-01678-3
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderKoneen Säätiöfi
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderKone Foundationen
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET, artikla 174 -ohjelmatfi
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET Programmesen
jyx.fundinginformationOpen access funding provided by Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Project Funding: M.T. was supported by the Kone Foundation (application 202206136). C.B. was supported by the Multiforest - project, which is funded under the umbrella of ERA-NET Cofund Forest-Value by Academy of Finland (326321). A. M. was supported by the Academy of Finland Flagship UNITE (337653). M.P. was funded by Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection. K.E. was supported partly by the Norwegian Research Council (NFR project 302701 Climate Smart Forestry Norway) and by the Academy of Finland Flagship UNITE (337653).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0