Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorSaine, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorPenttilä, Reijo
dc.contributor.authorFurneaux, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorMonkhouse, Norman
dc.contributor.authorZakharov, Evgeny V.
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, Otso
dc.contributor.authorAbrego, Nerea
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-22T08:15:36Z
dc.date.available2023-11-22T08:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationSaine, S., Penttilä, R., Furneaux, B., Monkhouse, N., Zakharov, E. V., Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2024). Natural deadwood hosts more diverse pioneering wood‐inhabiting fungal communities than restored deadwood. <i>Restoration Ecology</i>, <i>32</i>(1), Article e14056. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14056</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_194515156
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/91997
dc.description.abstractDeadwood can be recreated as a forest restoration measure to increase the amount of deadwood and assist deadwood-dependent biodiversity. While deadwood restoration is known to have an overall positive effect on associated species in the long term, it remains poorly understood how and when wood-inhabiting organisms colonize different kinds of deadwood, which is essential for developing efficient restoration frameworks. In this study, we use DNA metabarcoding to compare wood-inhabiting fungal communities between fresh naturally fallen spruce logs and spruce logs felled for restoration. The results show that although pioneering fungal community composition greatly differs between natural and felled logs, with natural logs hosting more species-rich and heterogeneous communities, felled logs still hold a relatively high fungal diversity. Responses to log type carried a strong phylogenetic signal, and orders Polyporales and Hymenochaetales including most species of conservation concern were more likely to occur in natural than in felled logs. Furthermore, we found that log type was more important for rarely recorded than commonly recorded taxa, suggesting that rare species might be more specialized in their habitat requirements than the common ones. Overall, while restored deadwood can hold a high fungal diversity, the results underline that freshly felled logs do not mimic fresh natural logs. Deadwood restoration should focus not only on increasing the quantity of deadwood but also on the quality of thereof, and most importantly, retaining the existing natural deadwood rather than artificially downing trees.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRestoration Ecology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.othercolonization
dc.subject.otherdeadwood restoration
dc.subject.otherecological restoration
dc.subject.othermetabarcoding
dc.subject.othermortality factor
dc.subject.othersaproxylic
dc.titleNatural deadwood hosts more diverse pioneering wood‐inhabiting fungal communities than restored deadwood
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202311228013
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1061-2971
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume32
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2023 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber342374
dc.relation.grantnumber856506
dc.relation.grantnumber856506
dc.relation.grantnumber346492
dc.relation.grantnumber345110
dc.relation.grantnumber336212
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/856506/EU//LIFEPLAN
dc.subject.ysopuut (kasvit)
dc.subject.ysoluonto
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysolahopuut
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8147
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13084
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17211
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1111/rec.14056
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderEuroopan komissiofi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Research Fellow, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramERC European Research Council, H2020en
jyx.fundingprogramResearch costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramResearch costs of Academy Professor, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramResearch post as Academy Professor, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiatutkija, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramERC European Research Council, H2020fi
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiaprofessorin tutkimuskulut, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiaprofessorin tehtävä, SAfi
jyx.fundinginformationWe want to thank Metsähallitus, UPM and the city of Helsinki for providing the study sites. We are grateful for the invaluable work done by J. Pennanen and J. Johnson in the field, E. Takala and M. Kilpinen during sample pre-processing, and C. Whitmell and A. Thompson during lab work. We thank IT Center for Science, Finland for computational resources. We would also like to acknowledge A. Cirtwill, H. Wirta, and T. Fukami for their insightful comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript, and two anonymous reviewers, managing editor V. Amaral, and coordinating editor J. Robinson for their helpful feedback. The study was funded by University of Helsinki Research Foundation (S.S.), University of Helsinki 3-year grant program (N.A.), Natural Resources Institute Finland (R.P.), Academy of Finland (grant no. 342374 and 346492 to N.A., and 336212 and 345110 to O.O.) and the European Union: the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation pro-gram (grant agreement no. 856506 to O.O.; ERC-synergy project LIFEPLAN).
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0