Natural deadwood hosts more diverse pioneering wood‐inhabiting fungal communities than restored deadwood
Abstract
Deadwood can be recreated as a forest restoration measure to increase the amount of deadwood and assist deadwood-dependent biodiversity. While deadwood restoration is known to have an overall positive effect on associated species in the long term, it remains poorly understood how and when wood-inhabiting organisms colonize different kinds of deadwood, which is essential for developing efficient restoration frameworks. In this study, we use DNA metabarcoding to compare wood-inhabiting fungal communities between fresh naturally fallen spruce logs and spruce logs felled for restoration. The results show that although pioneering fungal community composition greatly differs between natural and felled logs, with natural logs hosting more species-rich and heterogeneous communities, felled logs still hold a relatively high fungal diversity. Responses to log type carried a strong phylogenetic signal, and orders Polyporales and Hymenochaetales including most species of conservation concern were more likely to occur in natural than in felled logs. Furthermore, we found that log type was more important for rarely recorded than commonly recorded taxa, suggesting that rare species might be more specialized in their habitat requirements than the common ones. Overall, while restored deadwood can hold a high fungal diversity, the results underline that freshly felled logs do not mimic fresh natural logs. Deadwood restoration should focus not only on increasing the quantity of deadwood but also on the quality of thereof, and most importantly, retaining the existing natural deadwood rather than artificially downing trees.
Main Authors
Format
Articles
Research article
Published
2024
Series
Subjects
Publication in research information system
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
The permanent address of the publication
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202311228013Use this for linking
Review status
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1061-2971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14056
Language
English
Published in
Restoration Ecology
Citation
- Saine, S., Penttilä, R., Furneaux, B., Monkhouse, N., Zakharov, E. V., Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2024). Natural deadwood hosts more diverse pioneering wood‐inhabiting fungal communities than restored deadwood. Restoration Ecology, 32(1), Article e14056. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14056
Funder(s)
Research Council of Finland
European Commission
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Research Council of Finland
Funding program(s)
Academy Research Fellow, AoF
ERC European Research Council, H2020
Research costs of Academy Research Fellow, AoF
Research costs of Academy Professor, AoF
Research post as Academy Professor, AoF
Akatemiatutkija, SA
ERC European Research Council, H2020
Akatemiatutkijan tutkimuskulut, SA
Akatemiaprofessorin tutkimuskulut, SA
Akatemiaprofessorin tehtävä, SA



Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.
Additional information about funding
We want to thank Metsähallitus, UPM and the city of Helsinki for providing the study sites. We are grateful for the invaluable work done by J. Pennanen and J. Johnson in the field, E. Takala and M. Kilpinen during sample pre-processing, and C. Whitmell and A. Thompson during lab work. We thank IT Center for Science, Finland for computational resources. We would also like to acknowledge A. Cirtwill, H. Wirta, and T. Fukami for their insightful comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript, and two anonymous reviewers, managing editor V. Amaral, and coordinating editor J. Robinson for their helpful feedback. The study was funded by University of Helsinki Research Foundation (S.S.), University of Helsinki 3-year grant program (N.A.), Natural Resources Institute Finland (R.P.), Academy of Finland (grant no. 342374 and 346492 to N.A., and 336212 and 345110 to O.O.) and the European Union: the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation pro-gram (grant agreement no. 856506 to O.O.; ERC-synergy project LIFEPLAN).
Copyright© 2023 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration