Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPocobello, Raffaella
dc.contributor.authorCamilli, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorBergström, Tomi
dc.contributor.authorvon Peter, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorHopfenbeck, Mark
dc.contributor.authorAderhold, Volkmar
dc.contributor.authorPilling, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSeikkula, Jaakko
dc.contributor.authorel Sehity, Tarek Josef
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T13:27:06Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T13:27:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPocobello, R., Camilli, F., Alvarez-Monjaras, M., Bergström, T., von Peter, S., Hopfenbeck, M., Aderhold, V., Pilling, S., Seikkula, J., & el Sehity, T. J. (2023). Open Dialogue services around the world : a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services. <i>Frontiers in Psychology</i>, <i>14</i>, Article 1241936. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_194432844
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/91960
dc.description.abstractObjective: This cross-sectional study investigates the characteristics and practices of mental health care services implementing Open Dialogue (OD) globally. Methods: A structured questionnaire including a self-assessment scale to measure teams’ adherence to Open Dialogue principles was developed. Data were collected from OD teams in various countries. Confirmatory Composite Analysis was employed to assess the validity and reliability of the OD self-assessment measurement. Partial Least Square multiple regression analysis was used to explore characteristics and practices which represent facilitating and hindering factors in OD implementation. Results: The survey revealed steady growth in the number of OD services worldwide, with 142 teams across 24 countries by 2022, primarily located in Europe. Referrals predominantly came from general practitioners, hospitals, and self-referrals. A wide range of diagnostic profiles was treated with OD, with psychotic disorders being the most common. OD teams comprised professionals from diverse backgrounds with varying levels of OD training. Factors positively associated with OD self-assessment included a high percentage of staff with OD training, periodic supervisions, research capacity, multi-professional teams, self-referrals, outpatient services, younger client groups, and the involvement of experts by experience in periodic supervision. Conclusion: The findings provide valuable insights into the characteristics and practices of OD teams globally, highlighting the need for increased training opportunities, supervision, and research engagement. Future research should follow the development of OD implementation over time, complement self-assessment with rigorous observations and external evaluations, focus on involving different stakeholders in the OD-self-assessment and investigate the long-term outcomes of OD in different contexts.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherOpen Dialogue
dc.subject.othermental health services
dc.subject.otherself-assessment
dc.subject.otherpeer support
dc.subject.otherscoping survey
dc.subject.otherimplementation
dc.subject.othermental health training
dc.subject.otherglobal survey
dc.titleOpen Dialogue services around the world : a scoping survey exploring organizational characteristics in the implementation of the Open Dialogue approach in mental health services
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202311177978
dc.contributor.laitosPsykologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Psychologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1664-1078
dc.relation.volume14
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2023 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysomielenterveyspalvelut
dc.subject.ysovertaistuki
dc.subject.ysomenetelmät
dc.subject.ysopsykiatrinen hoito
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7914
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12878
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1913
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7915
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241936
jyx.fundinginformationThe scoping survey is part of the research project HOPEnDialogue, funded by “Open Excellence”- Foundation for Excellence in Mental Health Care Inc. Grant: ISTC/CNR- Prot. 692/2019.
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0