Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorDou, Haoran
dc.contributor.authorLei, Yi
dc.contributor.authorPan, Yafeng
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hong
dc.contributor.authorAstikainen, Piia
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T06:58:41Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T06:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationDou, H., Lei, Y., Pan, Y., Li, H., & Astikainen, P. (2023). Impact of observational and direct learning on fear conditioning generalization in humans. <i>Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry</i>, <i>121</i>, Article 110650. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110650" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110650</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_156956401
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/89232
dc.description.abstractHumans gain knowledge about threats not only from their own experiences but also from observing others' behavior. A neutral stimulus is associated with a threat stimulus for several times and the neutral stimulus will evoke fear responses, which is known as fear conditioning. When encountering a new event that is similar to one previously associated with a threat, one may feel afraid and produce fear responses. This is called fear generalization. Previous studies have mostly focused on fear conditioning and generalization based on direct learning, but few have explored how observational fear learning affects fear conditioning and generalization. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has focused on the neural correlations of fear conditioning and generalization based on observational learning. In the present study, 58 participants performed a differential conditioning paradigm in which they learned the associations between neutral cues (i.e., geometric figures) and threat stimuli (i.e., electric shock). The learning occurred on their own (i.e., direct learning) and by observing other participant's responses (i.e., observational learning); the study used a within-subjects design. After each learning condition, a fear generalization paradigm was conducted by each participant independently while their behavioral responses (i.e., expectation of a shock) and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings or responses were recorded. The shock expectancy ratings showed that observational learning, compared to direct learning, reduced the differentiation between the conditioned threatening stimuli and safety stimuli and the increased shock expectancy to the generalization stimuli. The EEG indicated that in fear learning, threatening conditioned stimuli in observational and direct learning increased early discrimination (P1) and late motivated attention (late positive potential [LPP]), compared with safety conditioned stimuli. In fear generalization, early discrimination, late motivated attention, and orienting attention (alpha-event-related desynchronization [alpha-ERD]) to generalization stimuli were reduced in the observational learning condition. These findings suggest that compared to direct learning, observational learning reduces differential fear learning and increases the generalization of fear, and this might be associated with reduced discrimination and attentional function related to generalization stimuli.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherobservational learning
dc.subject.otherfear conditioning
dc.subject.otherfear generalization
dc.subject.otherevent-related potentials
dc.subject.otheralpha-band oscillations
dc.titleImpact of observational and direct learning on fear conditioning generalization in humans
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202309255240
dc.contributor.laitosPsykologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Psychologyen
dc.contributor.oppiainePsykologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePsychologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0278-5846
dc.relation.volume121
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokokemukset
dc.subject.ysoehdollistuminen
dc.subject.ysoärsykkeet
dc.subject.ysopelko
dc.subject.ysoEEG
dc.subject.ysoelektrofysiologia
dc.subject.ysoyleistäminen
dc.subject.ysososiaalinen oppiminen
dc.subject.ysohavainnot
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3209
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2942
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2943
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10848
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3328
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7871
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20099
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16193
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5284
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110650
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant Numbers, 31871130), the Guangdong Key Project “Development of new tools for diagnosis and treatment of Autism” (2018B030335001), Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science-Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions (grant number 2019SHIBS0003), Otto A. Malm Foundation (personal grant to HD), and Finnish Cultural Foundation (personal grant to HD).
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0