Creating Implicit Measure Stimulus Sets Using a Multi-Step Piloting Method
Phipps, D. J., & Hamilton, K. (2023). Creating Implicit Measure Stimulus Sets Using a Multi-Step Piloting Method. Methods and Protocols, 6(3), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6030047
Julkaistu sarjassa
Methods and ProtocolsPäivämäärä
2023Tekijänoikeudet
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
The effect of arbitrary stimulus selection is a persistent concern when employing implicit measures. The current study tests a data-driven multi-step procedure to create stimulus items using a combination of free-recall and survey data. Six sets of stimulus items were created, representing healthy food and high sugar items in children, adolescents, and adults. Selected items were highly representative of the target concepts, in frequent use, and of near equal length. Tests of the piloted items in two samples showed slightly higher implicit measure–behavior relations compared to a previously used measure, providing preliminary support for the value in empirically based stimulus selection. Further, the items reported as being the most associated with their target concepts differed notably from what one may expect from the guidelines or population consumption patterns, highlighting the importance of informed stimulus selection.
Julkaisija
MDPI AGISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2409-9279Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/183088201
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Liikuntatieteiden tiedekunta [3160]
Lisätietoja rahoituksesta
This submission was supported by the Griffith University Centre for Mental Health Quality Publication Scheme.Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Paper vs. Pixel: Can We Use a Pen-and-Paper Method to Measure Athletes' Implicit Doping Attitude?
Chan, Derwin K. C.; Lee, Alfred S. Y.; Tang, Tracy C. W.; Gucciardi, Daniel F.; Yung, Patrick S. H.; Hagger, Martin (Frontiers Research Foundation, 2017)Doping attitude is an individual’s subjective evaluation (e.g., good or bad, useful or useless) toward the use of prohibited performance-enhancing substances or methods in sports. Research on doping attitude has traditionally ... -
OpenSR: An Open-Source Stimulus-Response Testing Framework
Matheus, Carolyn C.; Svegliato, Justin (University of Jyväskylä, Agora Center, 2015)Stimulus–response (S–R) tests provide a unique way to acquire information about human perception by capturing automatic responses to stimuli and attentional processes. This paper presents OpenSR, a user-centered S–R testing ... -
Brain responses of dysphoric and control participants during a self‐esteem implicit association test
Lou, Yixue; Lei, Yi; Astikainen, Piia; Peng, Weiwei; Otieno, Suzanne; Leppänen, Paavo H. T. (Wiley-Blackwell, 2021)Previous studies have reported lowered implicit self‐esteem at the behavioral level among depressed individuals. However, brain responses related to the lowered implicit self‐esteem have not been investigated in people ... -
Implicit versus explicit attitude to doping: Which better predicts athletes’ vigilance towards unintentional doping?
Chan, Derwin King Chung; Keatley, David A.; Tang, Tracy C.W.; Dimmock, James A.; Hagger, Martin (Elsevier, 2018)This preliminary study examined whether implicit doping attitude, explicit doping attitude, or both, predicted athletes’ vigilance towards unintentional doping. Design A cross-sectional correlational design. Metho ... -
Child-rearing practices and attitudes as measured by different tecniques : 1, Parental attitudes and child-rearing practices : a methodological study. 2, Child-rearing practices and attitudes in different social environments
Takala, Martti; Nummenmaa, Tapio; Kauranne, Urpo; Takala, Annika (1960)
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.