dc.contributor.author | Kenemans, J. Leon | |
dc.contributor.author | Schutte, Iris | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Bijnen, Sam | |
dc.contributor.author | Logemann, H.N. Alexander | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-08T05:34:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-08T05:34:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kenemans, J. L., Schutte, I., Van Bijnen, S., & Logemann, H. A. (2023). How salience enhances inhibitory control : An analysis of electro-cortical mechanisms. <i>Biological Psychology</i>, <i>177</i>, Article 108505. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108505</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_176625046 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/85388 | |
dc.description.abstract | Stop-signal tasks (SSTs) combined with human electro-cortical recordings (Event-Related Potentials, ERPs) have revealed mechanisms associated with successful stopping (relative to failed), presumably contributing to inhibitory control. The corresponding ERP signatures have been labeled stop N1 (+/- 100-ms latency), stop N2 (200 ms), and stop P3 (160–250 ms), and argued to reflect more sensory-specific (N1) versus more generic (N2, P3) mechanisms. However, stop N1 and stop N2, as well as latencies of stop-P3, appear to be quite inconsistent across studies. The present work addressed the possible influence of stop-signal salience, expecting high salience to induce clear stop N1s but reduced stop N2s, and short-latency stop P3s. Three SST varieties were combined with high-resolution EEG. An imperative visual (go) stimulus was occasionally followed by a subsequent (stop) stimulus that signalled to withhold the just initiated response. Stop-Signal Reaction Times (SSRTs) decreased linearly from visual-low to visual-high-salience to auditory. Auditory Stop N1 was replicated. A C1-like visual evoked potential (latency < 100 ms) was observed only with high salience, but not robustly associated with successful versus failed stops. Using the successful-failed contrast a visual stop-N1 analogue (112–156 ms post-stop-signal) was identified, as was right-frontal stop N2, but neither was sensitive to salience. Stop P3 had shorter latency for high than for low salience, and the extent of the early high-salience stop P3 correlated inversely with SSRT. These results suggest that salience-enhanced inhibitory control as manifest in SSRTs is associated with generic rather than sensory-specific electrocortical mechanisms. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Biological Psychology | |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
dc.subject.other | inhibitory control | |
dc.subject.other | sensory-specific versus generic | |
dc.subject.other | EEG/ ERP | |
dc.subject.other | salience | |
dc.subject.other | electro-cortical mechanisms | |
dc.title | How salience enhances inhibitory control : An analysis of electro-cortical mechanisms | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202302081668 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Psykologian laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Psychology | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Psykologia | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Monitieteinen aivotutkimuskeskus | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Psychology | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Centre for Interdisciplinary Brain Research | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | School of Wellbeing | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.relation.issn | 0301-0511 | |
dc.relation.volume | 177 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | kognitiivinen neurotiede | |
dc.subject.yso | käyttäytyminen | |
dc.subject.yso | aivokuori | |
dc.subject.yso | itsehallinta | |
dc.subject.yso | EEG | |
dc.subject.yso | elektrofysiologia | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23133 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3625 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7039 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17219 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3328 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7871 | |
dc.rights.url | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108505 | |
jyx.fundinginformation | Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (Grant no. K131635) for H.N.A.L. | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |