Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorVergarechea, M.
dc.contributor.authorAstrup, R.
dc.contributor.authorFischer, C.
dc.contributor.authorØistad, K.
dc.contributor.authorBlattert, C.
dc.contributor.authorHartikainen, M.
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, K.
dc.contributor.authorDi Fulvio, F.
dc.contributor.authorForsell, N.
dc.contributor.authorBurgas, D.
dc.contributor.authorToraño-Caicoya, A.
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, M.
dc.contributor.authorAntón-Fernández, C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-04T08:13:46Z
dc.date.available2023-01-04T08:13:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationVergarechea, M., Astrup, R., Fischer, C., Øistad, K., Blattert, C., Hartikainen, M., Eyvindson, K., Di Fulvio, F., Forsell, N., Burgas, D., Toraño-Caicoya, A., Mönkkönen, M., & Antón-Fernández, C. (2023). Future wood demands and ecosystem services trade-offs : A policy analysis in Norway. <i>Forest Policy and Economics</i>, <i>147</i>, Article 102899. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102899</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_164889792
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/84755
dc.description.abstractTo mitigate climate change, several European countries have launched policies to promote the development of a renewable resource-based bioeconomy. These bioeconomy strategies plan to use renewable biological resources, which will increase timber and biomass demands and will potentially conflict with multiple other ecosystem services provided by forests. In addition, these forest ecosystem services (FES) are also influenced by other, different, policy strategies, causing a potential mismatch in proposed management solutions for achieving the different policy goals. We evaluated how Norwegian forests can meet the projected wood and biomass demands from the international market for achieving mitigation targets and at the same time meet nationally determined targets for other FES. Using data from the Norwegian national forest inventory (NFI) we simulated the development of Norwegian forests under different management regimes and defined different forest policy scenarios, according to the most relevant forest policies in Norway: national forest policy (NFS), biodiversity policy (BIOS), and bioeconomy policy (BIES). Finally, through multi-objective optimization, we identified the combination of management regimes matching best with each policy scenario. The results for all scenarios indicated that Norway will be able to satisfy wood demands of up to 17 million m3 in 2093. However, the policy objectives for FES under each scenario caused substantial differences in terms of the management regimes selected. We observed that BIES and NFS resulted in very similar forest management programs in Norway, with a dominance of extensive management regimes. In BIOS there was an increase of set aside areas and continuous cover forestry, which made it more compatible with biodiversity indicators. We also found multiple synergies and trade-offs between the FES, likely influenced by the definition of the policy targets at the national scale.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesForest Policy and Economics
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherecosystem services
dc.subject.othermulti-objective optimization
dc.subject.otherforest policy
dc.subject.otherforest management
dc.titleFuture wood demands and ecosystem services trade-offs : A policy analysis in Norway
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202301041110
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1389-9341
dc.relation.volume147
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subject.ysometsäpolitiikka
dc.subject.ysomonitavoiteoptimointi
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemit (ekologia)
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11339
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p32016
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4997
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102899
jyx.fundinginformationThis work has been conducted in the frame of the MultiForest project. Project MultiForest is supported under the umbrella of ERA-NET Cofund ForestValue by the Academy of Finland, Business Finland, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment & Water Management (Austria), the Agency for Renewable Resources (Germany), the Research Council of Norway, and Vinnova/Formas/SWEA (Sweden). ForestValue has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement N° 773324.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0